e-ISSN 2518-1181
DOI 10.33146/2518-1181
Online Media ID R40-06293
← Back Published: 30.09.2026

The Role of an Accountant’s Professional Ethics in Preventing Greenwashing

Authors

Viktoriia Novodvorska 'Nizhyn agrotechnical institute' Separated unit of National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine, Nizhyn, Ukraine ORCID 0009-0007-6475-6447
Victor Mazur National Scientific Centre "Institute of Agrarian Economics", Kyiv, Ukraine ORCID 0009-0007-7641-4946

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33146/2307-9878-2026-3(113)-82-92

Abstract

The growing role of ESG information in economic decision-making intensifies demands for its reliability, completeness, and impartiality, while simultaneously increasing the risk of greenwashing – the creation of a misleading impression regarding a company’s environmental performance. Under these conditions, the issue of not only external regulation and oversight but also internal mechanisms to prevent information distortion – specifically the professional ethics of the accountant directly involved in preparing such information – becomes increasingly relevant. This article aims to substantiate the role of an accountant’s professional ethics as an internal mechanism for preventing greenwashing in sustainability reporting. The research methodology relies on systemic and structural-functional approaches, employing methods such as analysis, systematization, classification, content analysis, comparison, and conceptual modeling. The study draws upon prior research, professional materials, and international ethical standards governing sustainability reporting assurance and the professional behavior of accountants. The research findings indicate that the key factors contributing to greenwashing include information asymmetry, the complexity of measuring non-financial indicators, the conflict between a company’s economic interests and transparency requirements, pressure from management and the organizational environment, and the inadequacy or perfunctory nature of external oversight. External mechanisms for countering greenwashing include legal and regulatory frameworks, sustainability reporting assurance, state oversight and supervision, market and public scrutiny, professional standards, and the institutional regulation of the accounting profession. At the same time, the professional ethics of accountants serve as an independent internal preventive mechanism; by upholding integrity, objectivity, professional competence, due care, and professional skepticism, this mechanism can prevent the distortion of ESG information at the very stage of its preparation. The article proposes a conceptual model that illustrates the interaction between accountants’ professional ethics and external greenwashing countermeasures; applying this model would help enhance the reliability of ESG data and trust in sustainability reporting.

Keywords

sustainability reporting, greenwashing, accountants’ professional ethics, professional judgment, ethical challenges, sustainability reporting assurance, reliability of ESG information
References
  1. GREENWASHING – Cambridge English Dictionary. Retrieved from: https://dictionary.cambridge.org/uk/dictionary/english/greenwashing
  2. Free, C., Jones, S., & Tremblay, M. S. (2025). Greenwashing and sustainability assurance: a review and call for future research. Journal of Accounting Literature, 47(4), 739–764. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAL-11-2023-0201
  3. Janik, A., & Ryszko, A. (2025). Greenwashing in sustainability reporting: A systematic literature review of strategic typologies and content-analysis-based measurement approaches. Sustainability, 18(1), 17. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18010017
  4. IESBA. (2025). Final Pronouncement: International Ethics Standards for Sustainability Assurance (including International Independence Standards) and Other Revisions to the Code Relating to Sustainability Assurance and Reporting. Retrieved from: https://www.ethicsboard.org/publications/final-pronouncement-international-ethics-standards-sustainability-assurance-including-international
  5. IESBA. (2025). Handbook of the International Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants, Including International Independence Standards. Retrieved from: https://www.ethicsboard.org/publications/2025-handbook-international-code-ethics-professional-accountants
  6. Haryana, R. D. T., Santosa, H. P., & Hidayah, N. (2025). Greenwashing dalam Pelaporan Keberlanjutan: Konstruksi Makna dan Dilema Profesional Akuntan Manajemen pada Perusahaan Manufaktur Terbuka di Indonesia. MAPAN: Jurnal Manajemen Akuntansi Palapa Nusantara, 10(2), 88–98. https://doi.org/10.51774/mapan.v10i2.262
  7. Pamungkas, E. W., Surahman, B., & Patria, N. (2026). Ethical issues in accounting practices and their implications to greenwashing. Journal of Economic, Bussines and Accounting (COSTING), 9(2), 1905–1915. https://doi.org/10.31539/7qjnta08
  8. Hlukhenkyi, S. Ye. (2026). Directions for the Development of External Audit Mechanisms to Counteract Greenwashing (pp. 373–375). In: Accounting, Analysis, Audit, Taxation, and Financial Monitoring within the Economic Security System and the Sustainable Development Paradigm: Conference Proceedings. Kyiv: KNEU. Retrieved from: https://ir.kneu.edu.ua/server/api/core/bitstreams/f2d1a335-d95e-4d33-9044-64828173940e/content#page=374 [in Ukrainian]
  9. Melnychuk, B., & Ostapchuk, S. (2024). Conceptual Foundations for Providing Integrated Reporting Assurance. Oblik i finansi, 2(104), 106–117. https://doi.org/10.33146/2307-9878-2024-2(104)-106-117 [in Ukrainian]
  10. Butenko, T., & Butenko, V. (2026). Luca Pacioli’s Double-Entry Principle as a Basis for Internal Control and Reliability of Mandatory Sustainability Reporting under ESRS. Oblik i finansi, 2(112), 24–32. https://doi.org/10.33146/2518-1181-2026-2(112)-24-32 [in Ukrainian]
  11. Tsiatkovska, O., & Voloshenko, Y. (2026). Transformation of non-financial reporting in the context of the evolution of the sustainable development paradigm. Economy and Society, 85. https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0072/2026-85-118 [in Ukrainian]
  12. Tyvonchuk, O. (2025). Corporate sustainability reporting transformation: a critical view on legitimacy theory. Journal of Lviv Polytechnic National University. Series of Economics and Management Issues, 9(1), 72–82. https://doi.org/10.23939/semi2025.01.072 [in Ukrainian]
  13. IESBA. (n. d.). Sustainability Questionnaire | Ethics Board. Retrieved from: https://www.ethicsboard.org/focus-areas/sustainability-reporting-and-assurance/sustainability-questionnaire
  14. ACCA. (2023). Ethical dilemmas in an era of sustainability reporting. Retrieved from: https://www.accaglobal.com/content/dam/gb/policy-and-insights/reports/2023/ethical-dilemmas-sustainability.pdf
  15. Peng, S., Wang, R., Zhou, S., & Wu, W. (2026). Do sustainability assurance practices address the greenwashing concerns of regulators. Accounting & Finance, 66(1), 951–978. https://doi.org/10.1111/acfi.70130
  16. Sari, Y. M., Saraswati, E., Atmini, S., & Prastiwi, A. (2026). A systematic literature review of assurance and greenwashing in sustainability reporting. Cogent Business & Management, 13(1), 2672039. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2026.2672039
  17. IESBA. (2022). Ethics Considerations in Sustainability Reporting, Including Guidance to Address Concerns About Greenwashing. Retrieved from: https://www.ethicsboard.org/publications/ethics-considerations-sustainability-reporting
  18. Fried, A., Rasmussen, J., Ottosson, M., & Nehler, H. (2026). Professional hybridization among management accountants: Navigating paradoxical tensions in environmental sustainability. Management Accounting Research, 68, 100958. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2025.100958
  19. IESBA. (2024). Proposed International Ethics Standards for Sustainability Assurance (including International Independence Standards) (IESSA) and Other Revisions to the Code Relating to Sustainability Assurance and Reporting. Retrieved from: https://www.ethicsboard.org/publications/proposed-international-ethics-standards-sustainability-assurance-including-international