e-ISSN 2518-1181
DOI 10.33146/2518-1181
Online Media ID R40-06293
← Back Published: 30.09.2026

Accounting and Information Support for Sustainability Reporting: Formation and Adaptation to ESRS Requirements

Authors

Yana Ishchenko Vinnytsia National Agrarian University, Vinnytsia, Ukraine ORCID 0000-0002-6819-5997
Oleksii Avdieiev Vinnytsia National Agrarian University, Vinnytsia, Ukraine ORCID 0009-0004-8596-3494

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33146/2518-1181-2026-3(113)-43-55

Abstract

The introduction of the CSRD and ESRS expands the requirements for disclosing information regarding sustainability impacts, risks, and opportunities, and necessitates the alignment of financial and non-financial data. The fragmentation of reporting information across an enterprise’s subsystems complicates its compilation, control, and verification. This article aims to substantiate the theoretical and organizational-methodical foundations for generating the information required for sustainability reporting and to identify ways to adapt these processes to ESRS requirements. The research methodology is based on an analysis of the CSRD and ESRS provisions, as well as scientific articles and methodical materials on the preparation of sustainability reports. Methods of analysis and synthesis, systematization, comparison, and structural-logical modeling were employed to process the collected data. The research findings indicate that the implementation of ESRS transforms corporate reporting from a predominantly financially oriented model into a system of interconnected financial and non-financial information disclosure. Key characteristics of this transformation include the expansion of the reporting information perimeter, the application of the double materiality concept, and heightened requirements for data quality, traceability, and verifiability. While accounting performs an integrating function, it is not a universal source of sustainability information. Therefore, adapting accounting to ESRS requirements should not involve creating a separate “sustainability accounting” system, but rather developing analytical accounting and integrating financial and non-financial information flows. The article presents a matrix-based approach to structuring accounting and information support by establishing links among material ESRS disclosures, data sources, accounting objects, analytical dimensions, non-financial indicators, responsible departments, and control procedures. This approach ensures the methodical organization of the information chain, extending from the primary source to the final disclosure in reports. The research findings enable improvements in analytical accounting, regulation of information flows and internal controls, and enhancement of data traceability, reliability, and verifiability as enterprises prepare for ESRS reporting.

Keywords

sustainability reporting, ESRS, CSRD, accounting and information support, accounting system, sustainable development, non-financial data, internal control
References
  1. Seletska, D. (2024). Sustainability reporting: formation, content, relevance. Economics, Management and Administration, 2(108), 109–117. https://doi.org/10.26642/ema-2024-2(108)-109-117 [in Ukrainian]
  2. Korol, S. Ya., Semenova, S. M., & Kurbet, M. A. (2022). Implementation of Sustainable Development Reporting in Ukraine: The Status and Prospects in the Context of European Integration. Business Inform, 1, 294–301. https://doi.org/10.32983/2222-4459-2022-1-294-301 [in Ukrainian]
  3. Hanusych, V., & Shimon, V. (2025). Implementation strategy for sustainable development accounting and reporting in Ukraine. Kyiv Economic Scientific Journal, 10, 28–34. https://doi.org/10.32782/2786-765X/2025-10-4 [in Ukrainian]
  4. Struk, N., & Demko, R. (2025). Accounting and analytical framework for the preparation of sustainability reports by enterprises. The Ukrainian Economic Journal, 10, 110–116. https://doi.org/10.32782/2786-8273/2025-10-17 [in Ukrainian]
  5. Minenkova, N. (2025). Adaptation of accounting to the requirements of sustainable development strategic approaches and algorithm for integrating non-financial reporting. Taurida Scientific Herald. Series: Economics, 25, 33–42. https://doi.org/10.32782/2708-0366/2025.25.4 [in Ukrainian]
  6. Tanasiieva, M. (2026). Modern challenges of the accounting system in the context of economic, social, and environmental responsibility. Economics, Management and Administration, 1(115), 120–130. https://doi.org/10.26642/ema-2026-1(115)-120-130 [in Ukrainian]
  7. Solodovnik, O., & Andrenko, O. (2025). Automation of accounting and reporting on sustainable development: prerequisites, functions and solutions. Economy and Society, 74. https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0072/2025-74-47 [in Ukrainian]
  8. Lehenchuk, S., & Fedorova, O. (2025). New Methods for Accounting Research of the Narrative Component of Sustainable Reporting: Challenges and Opportunities. Oblik i finansi, 3(109), 31–40. https://doi.org/10.33146/2518-1181-2025-3(109)-31-40 [in Ukrainian]
  9. Butenko, T., & Butenko, V. (2026). Luca Pacioli’s Double-Entry Principle as a Basis for Internal Control and Reliability of Mandatory Sustainability Reporting under ESRS. Oblik i fìnansi, 2(112), 24–32. https://doi.org/10.33146/2518-1181-2026-2(112)-24-32 [in Ukrainian]
  10. Fedorova, O. (2025). Historical background of the emergence and formation of sustainability reporting. Problems of Theory and Methodology of Accounting, Control and Analysis, 1(60), 57–66. https://doi.org/10.26642/pbo-2025-1(60)-57-66 [in Ukrainian]
  11. Tyvonchuk, O., & Titov, D. (2025). The impact of stakeholder theory on the development of sustainability reporting and its standardisation. Herald of Khmelnytskyi National University. Economic Sciences, 342(3(1), 161–170. https://doi.org/10.31891/2307-5740-2025-342-3(1)-24 [in Ukrainian]
  12. Bezverkhyi, К. (2024). Implementation European sustainability reporting standards. Foreign Trade: Economics, Finance, Law, 2(133), 134–150. https://doi.org/10.31617/3.2024(133)08 [in Ukrainian]
  13. European Commission. (3 July 2026). Commission adopts revised sustainability reporting standards – Finance. Retrieved from: https://finance.ec.europa.eu/news/commission-adopts-revised-sustainability-reporting-standards-2026-07-03_en
  14. Holovchak, H. (2024). Evaluating the effectiveness of ESG reporting as a business transparency tool in the context of globalisation. Economy and Society, 67. https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0072/2024-67-28 [in Ukrainian]
  15. Bezhenar, A., & Stashenko, Y. (2026). Formation of ESG indicators in the system of non-financial reporting of enterprises: European integration context and ESRS standards. Economy and Society, 86. https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0072/D2026-86-178 [in Ukrainian]
  16. Hanusych, V. O., & Sheverya, Ya. V. (2026). Transformation of control procedures in accounting and reporting in the context of sustainable development. Kyiv Economic Scientific Journal, 13, 57–65. https://doi.org/10.32782/2786-765X/2026-13-7 [in Ukrainian]
  17. Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine. (2024). On approval of the Strategy for the introduction of sustainable development reporting by enterprises: Order No. 1015-р. Retrieved from: https://mof.gov.ua/storage/files/R1015.pdf [in Ukrainian]