e-ISSN 2518-1181
DOI 10.33146/2518-1181
Online Media ID R40-06293
← Back Published: 30.09.2026

Conceptual Foundations for Transforming the Scope and Objects of Accounting for Cluster Formations in the Context of Sustainable Development

Authors

Valerii Zhuk National Scientific Centre "Institute of Agrarian Economics", Kyiv, Ukraine Institute of Accounting and Finance, Ukraine ORCID 0000-0003-1367-5333
Yuliia Nezhyd National Scientific Centre "Institute of Agrarian Economics", Kyiv, Ukraine Institute of Accounting and Finance, Ukraine ORCID 0000-0003-2807-0687

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33146/2518-1181-2026-3(113)-29-42

Abstract

The development of cluster forms of interorganizational interaction is accompanied by the joint use of resources and infrastructure, the exchange of knowledge and technologies, the implementation of innovative projects, and the emergence of environmental and social impacts. At the same time, enterprises participating in cluster formations retain legal and economic independence, as a result of which information on the assets involved, resource flows, transaction costs, and the results of joint activities is recorded in separate accounting systems. This causes data fragmentation and complicates information support for managing key cluster assets. The article aims to substantiate the conceptual principles and develop a model for transforming the subject-object basis of accounting for cluster formations under conditions of sustainable development. The research methodology combines institutional and systemic approaches to accounting within cluster formations, supplemented by the provisions of cluster theory and transaction cost theory. The article reveals the organizational features of cluster interaction and trends in their development in the European Union and Ukraine. Additionally, it systematizes the requirements of international financial reporting standards and sustainable development reporting standards for accounting and disclosure of information about key processes and assets. The results of the study indicate that these standards regulate the formation of information at the level of a separate reporting enterprise, but do not determine the mechanism for coordinating it among legally independent cluster participants. To overcome the identified information gap at the fundamental level, the authors propose the concept of methodological and organizational-methodical support, along with an applied model for transforming the subject-object basis of accounting for cluster entities in the context of sustainable development. Also, they substantiate the feasibility of developing and defining the contours of a coordinated accounting policy for cluster participant enterprises, comprising coordinated methodological approaches, analytical sections, document-flow rules, and information-exchange formats. The practical application of the proposed model will contribute to increasing the comparability of accounting information, the traceability of resource flows, and the coordination of accounting and information support for cluster interaction, while ensuring compliance with regulatory requirements for the accounting systems of participating enterprises.

Keywords

cluster formation, biocluster, key assets, agreed accounting policy, subject-object transformation, transaction costs, sustainability reporting
References
  1. Marshall, A. (1920). Principles of economics (8th ed.). London: Macmillan and Co. Retrieved from: https://www.scribd.com/document/853575736/Marshall-Alfred-Principles-of-Economics-1920-8-ed
  2. Krugman, P. (1991). Increasing returns and economic geography. Journal of Political Economy, 99(3), 483–499. https://doi.org/10.1086/261763
  3. Porter, M. E. (1998). Clusters and the new economics of competition. Harvard Business Review, 76(6), 77–90. Retrieved from: https://static1.squarespace.com/static/54fe01fde4b068b128045b78/t/568a998c25981d3d913bba04/1451923852664/Clusters+and+the+economy.1998.pdf
  4. Enright, M. J. (2003). Regional clusters: What we know and what we should know. In: J. Bröcker, D. Dohse, & R. Soltwedel (Eds.), Innovation clusters and interregional competition (pp. 99–129). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-24760-9_6
  5. Maskell, P., & Lorenzen, M. (2004). The cluster as market organisation. Urban Studies, 41(5–6), 991–1009. https://doi.org/10.1080/00420980410001675878
  6. Cooke, P. (2002). Biotechnology clusters as regional, sectoral innovation systems. International Regional Science Review, 25(1), 8–37. https://doi.org/10.1177/016001760202500102
  7. Lu, H., Yao, Z., Cheng, Z., & Xue, A. (2025). The Impact of Innovation-Driven Industrial Clusters on Urban Carbon Emission Efficiency: Empirical Evidence from China. Sustainable Cities and Society, 121, 106220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2025.106220
  8. Rocha, H., & Audretsch, D. B. (2026). Entrepreneurial ecosystems, regional clusters, and industrial districts: Historical transformations or rhetorical devices?. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 51, 583–606. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-022-09920-6
  9. Heiets, V. (2008). Clusters and network structures in the economy: A rather interesting topic that has not yet been fully explored. Ekonomist, 10, 10–11. [in Ukrainian]
  10. Sabluk, P. T., & Kropyvko, M. F. (2010). Clustering as a mechanism for enhancing the competitiveness and social orientation of the agrarian economy. Ekonomika APK, 1(183), 3–12. [in Ukrainian]
  11. Shyposha, V. A. (2021). Mechanism for managing the development of business-integrated structures in industrial regions (PhD Dissertation Abstract). Kyiv: Institute of Industrial Economics of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine. Retrieved from: https://iie.org.ua/wp-content/uploads/application/pdf/avtoreferat_shyposha-v.a..pdf [in Ukrainian]
  12. Hyk, V. (2025). Peculiarities of accounting for financing the activities of cluster formations. Acta Academiae Beregsasiensis. Economics, 1(9), 159–174. https://doi.org/10.58423/2786-6742/2025-9-159-174 [in Ukrainian]
  13. Vysochan, O., Stanasiuk, N., Honchar, S., Hyk, V., & Vysochan, O. (2024). Implementation of the Provisions of the Cluster Theory into the Accounting System: Genesis and Evolution. Theoretical and Practical Research in Economic Fields, 15(1), 5–16. https://doi.org/10.14505/tpref.v15.1(29).01
  14. Zhuk, V. (2018). Development of accounting theory: Institutional aspect. Kyiv: NSC “Institute of Agrarian Economics”. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21128044 [in Ukrainian]
  15. European Commission. (n. d.). Cluster policy. Retrieved from: https://single-market-economy.ec.europa.eu/industry/cluster-policy_en
  16. Verkhovna Rada Ukrainy. (2025). On the peculiarities of regulating the activities of legal entities of certain organizational and legal forms during the transitional period and associations of legal entities: Law of Ukraine No. 4196-IX. Retrieved from: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/4196-20#Text [in Ukrainian]
  17. European Cluster Collaboration Platform. (2026). Clusters and Europe’s competitiveness: ECCP summary report 2025. European Union. Retrieved from: https://www.clustercollaboration.eu/sites/default/files/document-store/ECCP_SummaryReport_2025_0.pdf
  18. Ukrainian Cluster Alliance. (n. d.). Map of clusters of the Ukrainian Cluster Alliance. Retrieved from: https://www.clusters.org.ua/clusters-map/ [in Ukrainian]
  19. Pyshchenko, O. (2020). Imperatives for the development of the green economy in the agricultural sector. Herald of Khmelnytskyi National University. Economic Sciences, 2(280), 286–290. Retrieved from: https://journals.khnu.km.ua/vestnik/?p=6067 [in Ukrainian]
  20. European Bioeconomy Clusters Alliance. (n. d.). Retrieved from: https://eurobioclusters.eu/
  21. Bio-based Industries Consortium. (n. d.). Retrieved from: https://biconsortium.eu/
  22. Bioeconomy Cluster. (n. d.). Bioeconomy Cluster. Retrieved from: https://bioeconomy.sk/en/
  23. CLIB – Cluster Industrial Biotechnology. (n. d.). Retrieved from: https://www.clib-cluster.de/en/clib-cluster-industrielle-biotechnologie/
  24. SPRING – Italian Circular Bioeconomy Cluster. (n. d.). Retrieved from: https://clusterspring.it/en/
  25. Cluster of Bioeconomy and Environment of Western Macedonia (CluBE): Company profile (n. d.). Retrieved from: https://www.bioeco-platform.eu/company/cluster-of-bioeconomy-and-environment-clube/
  26. International Sustainability Standards Board. (2023). IFRS S1 General requirements for disclosure of sustainability-related financial information. Retrieved from: https://www.ifrs.org/issued-standards/ifrs-sustainability-standards-navigator/ifrs-s1-general-requirements.html/content/dam/ifrs/publications/html-standards-issb/english/2026/issued/issbs1/
  27. International Sustainability Standards Board. (2023). IFRS S2 climate-related disclosures. IFRS Foundation. Retrieved from: https://www.ifrs.org/issued-standards/ifrs-sustainability-standards-navigator/ifrs-s2-climate-related-disclosures.html/content/dam/ifrs/publications/html-standards-issb/english/2026/issued/issbs2/
  28. European Commission. (2023). Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2023/2772 of 31 July 2023 supplementing Directive 2013/34/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards sustainability reporting standards. Retrieved from: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg_del/2023/2772/oj/eng
  29. International Accounting Standards Board. (2012). International Financial Reporting Standards: IFRS, IFRS for SMEs, including IAS, IFRIC and SIC interpretations. Retrieved from: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/929_010#Text [in Ukrainian]