e-ISSN 2518-1181
DOI 10.33146/2518-1181
Online Media ID R40-06293
← Back Published: 30.05.2026

Disclosure of Land Use Indicators in Sustainability Reporting

Authors

Serhii Ostapchuk National Scientific Centre "Institute of Agrarian Economics", Kyiv, Ukraine ORCID 0000-0002-2342-6376
Nataliya Tsaruk 'Nizhyn agrotechnical institute' Separated unit of National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine, Nizhyn, Ukraine ORCID 0000-0001-5426-1378

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33146/2518-1181-2026-2(112)-72-81

Abstract

Since the agricultural sector is one of the industries with a high environmental impact, ESG reporting issues and the disclosure of non-financial land-use indicators are becoming necessary to ensure transparency in agribusiness activities, increase accountability, and enhance investment attractiveness. This article provides a systematic review of the international regulatory framework for sustainability reporting, with a special emphasis on the requirements for rational land-use indicators, and assesses the level of disclosure of land-use indicators by large agricultural companies in Ukraine in their sustainability reports. The research methodology is based on a comprehensive interdisciplinary approach that combines regulatory and comparative analysis, content analysis of corporate reporting, and case analysis of the practice of disclosing land-use indicators. The results of the study show that a multi-level system of regulatory oversight for the disclosure of land-use indicators in sustainability reporting has been established at the global level, with different frameworks performing complementary functions. International practice is gradually shifting from a declaratory description of environmental responsibility to a measurable, spatially detailed, and integrated disclosure of land-use indicators. Among all regulatory frameworks, the ESRS and TNFD offer the most comprehensive approach, requiring not only performance reporting but also indicators to assess ecosystem risks, land degradation, land-use changes, and business dependence on natural capital. In Ukraine, the largest agroholdings either do not publish sustainability reporting at all or limit it to a declaratory description of environmental initiatives, without providing quantitative indicators suitable for independent assessment and comparison. This indicates a lack of institutional maturity of ESG disclosure practices in the Ukrainian agricultural sector. Among Ukrainian agroholdings, Kernel Holding S.A. demonstrates the most systematic approach to disclosing land-use indicators, combining elements of the GRI, TNFD, and CDP methodologies. The practical value of such disclosure is moderate. However, we identified significant gaps in the company’s corporate reporting on sustainable land-use indicators, which are important under the ESRS E4 standards and the TNFD recommendations. The results of this study lay the foundation for improving Ukrainian corporate disclosure of ESG indicators in the agricultural sector.

Keywords

sustainability reporting, accounting for land, sustainable land-use indicators, assessment of agricultural land, ESG indicators, regulatory frameworks for sustainability reporting, Ukrainian agricultural holdings, transparency of agricultural business
References
  1. Frouz, J., Čemus, V., Frouzová, J., Peterková, A., & Kotecký, V. (2024). Can corporate supply chain sustainability standards contribute to soil protection?. Soil, 10(2), 505–519. https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-10-505-2024
  2. Gerber, R., Smit, A., & Botha, M. (2024). An evaluation of environmental, social, and governance reporting in the agricultural sector. Business Strategy & Development, 7(1), e316. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsd2.316
  3. Makarenko, I., Steiner, B., & Yuhai, K. (2024). Transparency of sustainability disclosure in agri-food value chain management: Mapping the scientific landscape. Problems & Perspectives in Management, 22(4), 268–287. http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.22(4).2024.21
  4. Muriel, M. J., Larrán, M., Andrades, J., & Calzado, M. Y. (2025). Sustainability information disclosure in the agri-food sector: a systematic literature review. British Food Journal, 127(8), 3041–3072. https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-08-2024-0783
  5. Jindřichovská, I., Kubíčková, D., & Mocanu, M. (2020). Case study analysis of sustainability reporting of an agri-food giant. Sustainability, 12(11), 4491. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12114491
  6. Buallay, A. (2022). Sustainability reporting and agriculture industries’ performance: worldwide evidence. Journal of Agribusiness in Developing and Emerging Economies, 12(5), 769–790. https://doi.org/10.1108/JADEE-10-2020-0247
  7. Sharma, R., & Dhruv, G. (2025). Cross-sectoral analysis of corporate biodiversity disclosures among top revenue global companies. Discover Sustainability, 6(1), 1256. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-025-02125-5
  8. Sustainability reporting | EFRAG. Retrieved from: https://www.efrag.org/en/sustainability-reporting
  9. Bassen, A., Buchholz, D., Lopatta, K., & Rudolf, A. R. (2025). Assessing biodiversity‐related disclosure: Drivers, outcomes, and financial impacts. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 29(1), 311–329. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.13596
  10. Dindar, E. (2026). TSRS-Aligned Sustainability Reporting in Turkey’s Agri-Food Sector: A Qualitative Content Analysis Based on GRI 13 and the SDGs. Sustainability, 18(2), 1085. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18021085
  11. Zhuk, V., Zamula, I., Liudvenko, D., & Popko, Y. (2020). Development of non-financial reporting of agricultural enterprises of Ukraine. Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, 6(4), 76–89. https://doi.org/10.51599/are.2020.06.04.05
  12. Metelytsia, V., Gagalyuk, T., & Kolisnyk, O. (2024). The report on sustainable development and investments in the agricultural sector: the environmental capital perspective. The Ukrainian Economic Journal, 6, 59–68. https://doi.org/10.32782/2786-8273/2024-6-10
  13. Vovk, V. (2025). Implementation of ESG concepts: a strategic imperative for the sustainable growth of small and medium-sized agricultural enterprises in Ukraine. Economy and Society, 81. https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0072/2025-81-117 [in Ukrainian]
  14. GRI – Standards. Retrieved from: https://www.globalreporting.org/standards/
  15. IFRS – General Sustainability-related Disclosures. Retrieved from: https://www.ifrs.org/projects/completed-projects/2023/general-sustainability-related-disclosures/
  16. Disclosure recommendations – TNFD. Retrieved from: https://tnfd.global/recommendations/
  17. ISO 14001:2026(en), Environmental management systems – Requirements with guidance for use. Retrieved from: https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/ru/#iso:std:92300:en
  18. THE 17 GOALS | Sustainable Development. Retrieved from: https://sdgs.un.org/goals
  19. CDP: Turning Transparency to Action. Retrieved from: https://www.cdp.net/en
  20. KPMG. (2024). GRI adoption for sustainable reporting increased to 71%: KPMG – ESG Post. Retrieved from: https://esgpost.com/gri-adoption-for-sustainable-reporting-increased-to-71-kpmg/
  21. PwC. (2026). Key insights from the PwC-IIF ISSB adoption survey. Retrieved from: https://www.pwc.com/us/en/services/esg/library/pwc-iif-issb-financial-institutions-survey.html
  22. Maletic, M., Podpečan, M., & Maletic, D. (2015). ISO 14001 in a corporate sustainability context: a multiple case study approach. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 26(6), 872–890. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEQ-08-2014-0129
  23. Reinbacher, S. C. (2025). Comparative Analysis of Disclosure Requirements of ESRS E and ISO 14001: Developing Measures to Bridge the Gaps. Master’s Thesis. https://doi.org/10.34901/mul.pub.2025.146
  24. Kwon, S., Kim, H., & Ko, C. (2026). Exploratory Analysis of Global TNFD Adoption and Strategic Implications for the Forestry and Environmental Sector. Forests, 17(3), 394. https://doi.org/10.3390/f17030394
  25. Kernel Holding S.A. (2024). Annual Report for the year ended 30 June 2023. Retrieved from: https://www.kernel.ua/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/FY2023_Kernel_Annual_Report.pdf
  26. Ostapchuk, S., & Voliak, L. (2026). Consequences of the Introduction of Mandatory Sustainability Reporting: A Critical Review of International Practice. Oblik i finansi, 1(111), 36-44. https://doi.org/10.33146/2307-9878-2026-1(111)-36-44 [in Ukrainian]
  27. Hanusych, V., & Shimon, V. (2025). Implementation strategy for sustainable development accounting and reporting in Ukraine. Kyiv Economic Scientific Journal, 10. 28–34. https://doi.org/10.32782/2786-765X/2025-10-4 [in Ukrainian]