e-ISSN 2518-1181
DOI 10.33146/2518-1181
Online Media ID R40-06293
← Back Published: 30.03.2026

Corporate Governance as an Institutional Basis for the Financial Transformation of Agricultural Companies in the Process of Entering International Capital Markets

Authors

Marian Tripak Educational and Rehabilitation Institution of Higher Education "Kamianets-Podilskyi State Institute", Kamianets-Podilskyi, Ukraine ORCID 0009-0000-5191-7730
Natalia Shevchuk Educational and Rehabilitation Institution of Higher Education "Kamianets-Podilskyi State Institute", Kamianets-Podilskyi, Ukraine ORCID 0000-0002-4223-3174

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33146/2518-1181-2026-1(111)-200-209

Abstract

The transformation of international capital markets under the influence of the concept of sustainable development changes the criteria for investment attractiveness. It reorients investors’ attention toward long-term value creation, accounting for economic, environmental, and management factors. Therefore, alongside financial data, non-financial indicators reflecting the quality of corporate governance are becoming increasingly important. This article aims to scientifically substantiate the role of corporate governance as an institutional basis for the formation and integration of economic, environmental, financial, and non-financial indicators in the process of financial transformation of agricultural companies as they enter international capital markets. The methodological basis of the study is the institutional approach, systemic and comparative analysis, and logical-structural modeling. The authors assessed the institutional maturity of corporate governance using expert analysis across five criteria: the presence of independent directors, the functioning of the audit committee, the level of disclosure of financial and non-financial information, the presence of ESG or integrated reporting, and access to international financial instruments. The empirical base was built on data from public financial and non-financial reporting of Ukrainian agricultural companies whose shares are listed on the London and Warsaw Stock Exchanges. As a result of the study, an institutional model of the financial transformation of an agricultural company was proposed, which reflects the cause-and-effect relationship between the quality of corporate governance, the integration of financial and ESG indicators, the reduction of information asymmetry, the minimization of the risk premium, and the growth of the company’s value. The results of the study indicate that the level of institutional maturity of corporate governance directly affects the depth of integration of non-financial indicators and companies’ ability to attract international capital. The practical significance of the results lies in the possibility of using the proposed model to assess the institutional capacity of agricultural enterprises in the process of integration into international capital markets and the formation of their long-term value.

Keywords

corporate governance, financial transformation, agricultural companies, institutional model, international capital markets, ESG indicators, company value
References
  1. Nivievskyi, O., & Bogonos, M. (2024). Impact assessment of agrifood trade between Ukraine and the EU and potential CAP transfers to Ukraine after accession. APD Ukraine. Retrieved from: https://tinyurl.com/2c5furwd
  2. Meckling, W. H., & Jensen, M. C. (1976). Theory of the Firm. Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X
  3. Porta, R. L., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1998). Law and finance. Journal of political economy, 106(6), 1113–1155. https://doi.org/10.1086/250042
  4. Gompers, P., Ishii, J., & Metrick, A. (2003). Corporate governance and equity prices. The quarterly journal of economics, 118(1), 107–156. https://doi.org/10.1162/00335530360535162
  5. Prodanchuk, M. A. (n.d.). Corporate reporting in management conditions. Problemy materialnoi kultury – ekonomichni nauky. Retrieved from: https://tinyurl.com/ypm49x8u [in Ukrainian]
  6. Durnev, A., & Kim, E. H. (2005). To steal or not to steal: firm attributes, legal environment, and valuation. Journal of Finance. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2005.00767.x
  7. Zhuk, V. M. (2015). Institutional theory of accounting: response to modern challenges. Bukhhalterskyi oblik i audyt, 8–9, 14–23. [in Ukrainian]
  8. Tereshchenko, O. O. (2003). Financial activity of business entities. Kyiv: KNEU. [in Ukrainian]
  9. Friede, G., Busch, T., & Bassen, A. (2015). ESG and financial performance: aggregated evidence from more than 2000 empirical studies. Journal of sustainable finance & investment, 5(4), 210–233. https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2015.1118917
  10. Directive (EU) 2022/2464 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 December 2022 amending Regulation (EU) No 537/2014, Directive 2004/109/EC, Directive 2006/43/EC and Directive 2013/34/EU, as regards corporate sustainability reporting. (2022). Retrieved from: https://tinyurl.com/252j53kt
  11. Boiko, V., Lyzak, M., Vasyltsiv, T., Lupak, R., & Ohinok, S. (2024). Financial and economic performance of agricultural enterprises: analysis and policy improvement. Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, 10(4), 129–151. https://doi.org/10.51599/are.2024.10.04.06
  12. Warsaw Stock Exchange. (n. d.). Retrieved from: https://tinyurl.com/3xrrcf4t
  13. London Stock Exchange. (n. d.). Retrieved from: https://tinyurl.com/4hkumacx
  14. Verkhovna Rada Ukrainy. (2012). Consolidated version of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (2012/C 326/01). Retrieved from: https://tinyurl.com/2cmu9e59 [in Ukrainian]
  15. European Commission. (n. d.). CAP and environment. Retrieved from: https://tinyurl.com/nd8fyyp7
  16. Prodanchuk, M., Bezdushna, J., Mykhalkiv, A., Shevchuk, N., & Popova, O. (2022). Development of integrated reporting in ensuring a balanced system of management system indicators. Financial and Credit Activity: Problems of Theory and Practice, 6(47), 111–123. https://doi.org/10.55643/fcaptp.6.47.2022.3928