e-ISSN 2518-1181
DOI 10.33146/2518-1181
Online Media ID R40-06293
← Back Published: 30.03.2026

Narrative Intelligence and Sustainability Reporting: A Stakeholder Approach

Authors

Serhii Lehenchuk Zhytomyr Polytechnic State University, Zhytomyr, Ukraine ORCID 0000-0002-3975-1210

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33146/2518-1181-2026-1(111)-5-17

Abstract

The introduction of the CSRD Directive and ESRS standards, which marked a “narrative turn” in the development of corporate reporting, has led to a gap between the complexity of sustainability reporting narratives and the ability of stakeholders to perceive them, since they are not sufficiently prepared for their critical analysis and interpretation for decision-making. The article aims to theoretically substantiate the concept of stakeholder narrative intelligence and determine its role in the system of sustainability reporting communications in the context of its regulatory transformation. The methodological basis of the study is the institutional approach, which enabled consideration of the evolution of sustainability reporting as a process of forming a new institutional practice under the influence of regulatory changes and public demands. To analyze the theoretical and methodological foundations of the narrative intelligence of stakeholders, methods of scientific abstraction, analysis, and synthesis were applied, which made it possible to generalize the work of researchers and identify the main trends in the transformation of accounting science in the context of the “narrative turn” of corporate reporting. The results of the study indicate that accounting narratives are considered not only as a supplement to digital reporting data but also as a tool for reducing information asymmetry and explaining complex business processes. The article systematizes approaches to understanding narrative intelligence from its origins in computer science to modern interpretations that focus on the ability to interpret and protect against manipulative influences. The feasibility of a narrowed approach is substantiated, within which narrative intelligence is defined as the competence of stakeholders to critically perceive, “decode,” and interpret the enterprise’s role in ensuring sustainable development through the analysis of narratives. The article proposes a classification of options for implementing narrative analysis depending on the subject and the method of information processing. Based on the hypothesis of narrative intelligence by K. Dautengahn, the author identified levels of its development in users of sustainability reporting: 1) zero (patterned reactions); 2) basic (analogies and structured templates); 3) advanced (meaningful integration of knowledge). As a result, this study identifies directions for further scientific research to improve the quality of communication in the “sustainable reporting – stakeholder” system.

Keywords

sustainability reporting, narrative intelligence, accounting narratives, stakeholders, institutional approach, narrative analysis, CSRD, ESRS, accounting communication
References
  1. Abela, M. (2020). Paradise Lost: Accounting narratives without numbers. Accounting Economics and Law – a Convivium, 10(2), Article 20190035. https://doi.org/10.1515/ael-2019-0035
  2. Beattie, V. (2014). Accounting narratives and the narrative turn in accounting research: Issues, theory, methodology, methods and a research framework. The British Accounting Review, 46(2), 111–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2014.05.001
  3. Beattie, V., McInnes, B., & Fearnley, S. (2004). A methodology for analysing and evaluating narratives in annual reports: A comprehensive descriptive profile and metrics for disclosure quality attributes. Accounting Forum, 28(3), 205–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accfor.2004.07.001
  4. Blair, D., & Meyer, T. (1997). Tools for an interactive virtual cinema. In: R. Trappl & P. Petta (Eds.), Creating personalities for synthetic actors: Towards autonomous personality agents (pp. 83–91). Springer Verlag.
  5. Dautenhahn, K. (2001). The narrative intelligence hypothesis: In search of the transactional format of narratives in humans and other social animals. In: M. Beynon, C. L. Nehaniv, & K. Dautenhahn (Eds.), CT 2001: Vol. 2117. Lecture notes in artificial intelligence (pp. 248–266). Springer-Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44617-6_22
  6. Dautenhahn, K., & Coles, S. (2001). Narrative intelligence from the bottom up: A computational framework for the study of story-telling in autonomous agents. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 4(1), Article 1. Retrieved from: https://www.jasss.org/4/1/1.html
  7. Di Tullio, P., La Torre, M., Dumay, J., & Rea, M. A. (2021). Accountingisation and the narrative (re)turn of business model information in corporate reporting. Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change, 18(4), 592–615. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAOC-02-2021-0024
  8. EFRAG. (2023). European sustainability reporting standards (ESRS). Retrieved from: https://xbrl.efrag.org/e-esrs/esrs-set1-2023.html
  9. Herhausen, D., Ludwig, S., Abedin, E., Haque, N. U., & De Jong, D. (2025). From words to insights: Text analysis in business research. Journal of Business Research, 198, Article 115491. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.115491
  10. Jerome, L. W. (2019). Collaboration, complexity and innovation: The stories we tell matter. SSRN Electronic Journal. Retrieved from: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3449732
  11. Lai, A., Melloni, G., & Stacchezzini, R. (2018). Integrated reporting and narrative accountability: The role of preparers. Accounting Auditing & Accountability Journal, 31(5), 1381–1405. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-08-2016-2674
  12. Larrinaga, C., & Bebbington, J. (2021). The pre-history of sustainability reporting: A constructivist reading. Accounting Auditing & Accountability Journal, 34(9), 162–181. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-03-2017-2872
  13. Lewis, C., & Young, S. (2019). Fad or future? Automated analysis of financial text and its implications for corporate reporting. Accounting and Business Research, 49(5), 587–615. https://doi.org/10.1080/00014788.2019.1611730
  14. Llewellyn, S. (1999). Narratives in accounting and management research. Accounting Auditing & Accountability Journal, 12(2), 220–237. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513579910270129
  15. Masztalerz, M. (2016). Why narratives in accounting?. Prace Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego We Wrocławiu, 434, 99–107. https://doi.org/10.15611/pn.2016.434.09
  16. Mateas, M., & Sengers, P. (Eds.). (1999). Narrative intelligence: Papers from the 1999 fall symposium (Technical Report FS-99-01). AAAI Press. Retrieved from: https://cdn.aaai.org/Symposia/Fall/1999/FS-99-01/FS99-01-001.pdf
  17. Merkl-Davies, D., Brennan, N., & Vourvachis, P. (2011, September 7–9). Text analysis methodologies in corporate narrative reporting research [Conference presentation]. 23rd CSEAR International Congress on Social and Environmental Accounting Research, St. Andrews, UK.
  18. Michelon, G., Trojanowski, G., & Sealy, R. (2021). Narrative reporting: State of the art and future challenges. Accounting in Europe, 19(1), 7–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449480.2021.1900601
  19. Miller, K. (n.d.). Unlocking the power of narrative intelligence. Blackbird.AI. Retrieved from: https://blackbird.ai/blog/unlocking-the-power-of-narrative-intelligence/
  20. Milne, M. J., & Chan, C. C. (1999). Narrative corporate social disclosures: How much of a difference do they make to investment decision-making?. The British Accounting Review, 31(4), 439–457. https://doi.org/10.1006/bare.1999.0108
  21. Newby, G. (2024, July 18). Narrative intelligence: The evolution of a concept. Edge Theory. Retrieved from: https://edgetheory.com/resources/narrative-intelligence-the-evolution-of-a-concept
  22. Randall, W. L. (1999). Narrative intelligence and the novelty of our lives. Journal of Aging Studies, 13(1), 11–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0890-4065(99)80003-6
  23. Riedl, M. O. (2016). Computational narrative intelligence: A human-centered goal for artificial intelligence. arXiv. Retrieved from: https://arxiv.org/abs/1602.06484
  24. Waniak-Michalak, H., & Michalak, J. (2024). Does reaction to controversy in corporate narratives depend on its significance for various stakeholders?. Central European Management Journal, 32(3), 436–457. https://doi.org/10.1108/CEMJ-06-2023-0259