e-ISSN 2518-1181
DOI 10.33146/2518-1181
Online Media ID R40-06293
← Back Published: 30.12.2025

The Narrative Component of Sustainability Reporting as a Strategic Tool of the Impression Management

Authors

Serhii Lehenchuk Zhytomyr Polytechnic State University, Zhytomyr, Ukraine ORCID 0000-0002-3975-1210

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33146/2518-1181-2025-4(110)-14-25

Abstract

In the context of the requirements of the EU Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD), sustainability reporting narratives serve as an effective means of revealing the complex cause-and-effect relationships, intentions, and strategic goals of an enterprise in the field of sustainable development. This article aims to analyse the narrative component of sustainability reporting in the context of CSRD and ESRS as a new communication channel between enterprises and stakeholders. It studies the causes, mechanisms, and consequences of manipulations with sustainability reporting narratives, based on the concept of impression management. The primary research tool is a theoretical and methodological analysis of scientific works focused on impression management in accounting. The author analysed key concepts, including E. Hoffmann's dramaturgical metaphor, legitimacy theory, and agency theory, to identify the motives, mechanisms, and consequences of using sustainability reporting narratives to exert the necessary influence on stakeholders. In addition, logical-theoretical modelling allowed for the identification of the consequences of information asymmetry, such as adverse selection and moral hazard, which reduce the efficiency of the sustainable investment market. The results of the study show that, unlike traditional financial reporting, the basis of sustainability reporting is narratives that describe the ESG aspects of an enterprise’s activities. This creates a wide field for the application of impression management methods to form a distorted image of the enterprise regarding its role in ensuring sustainable development. Such actions lead to the emergence of information asymmetry between narrators and stakeholders. The consequences of this are an inefficient redistribution of capital in the sustainable investment market, moral hazard, and a undermining of trust. To overcome these threats, the study identifies the objects of sustainability reporting narratives in accordance with the ESRS. In addition, it identifies potential areas for regulatory improvement to enhance the transparency of sustainability reporting.

Keywords

sustainability reporting, accounting narratives, impression management, CSRD, ESRS, strategic management, agency theory
References
  1. Lehenchuk, S., & Fedorova, O. (2025). New Methods for Accounting Research of the Narrative Component of Sustainable Reporting: Challenges and Opportunities. Oblik i finansi, 3(109), 31–40. https://doi.org/10.33146/2518-1181-2025-3(109)-31-40 [in Ukrainian]
  2. Aerts, W. (2004). Picking up the pieces: Impression management in the retrospective attributional framing of accounting outcomes. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 30(6), 493–517. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2004.07.001
  3. Beattie, V. (2014). Accounting narratives and the narrative turn in accounting research: Issues, theory, methodology, methods and a research framework. The British Accounting Review, 46(2), 111–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2014.05.001
  4. Cho, C. H., Laine, M., Roberts, R. W., & Rodrigue, M. (2015). Organized hypocrisy, organizational façades, and sustainability reporting. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 40, 78–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2014.12.003
  5. Cho, C. H., & Patten, D. M. (2006). The role of environmental disclosures as tools of legitimacy: A research note. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 32(7–8), 639–647. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2006.09.009
  6. Cho, C. H., Roberts, R. W., & Patten, D. M. (2009). The language of US corporate environmental disclosure. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 35(4), 431–443. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2009.10.002
  7. Clatworthy, M., & Jones, M. J. (2001). The effect of thematic structure on the variability of annual report readability. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 14(3), 311–326. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513570110399890
  8. Cooper, S., & Slack, R. (2015). Reporting practice, impression management and company performance: A longitudinal and comparative analysis of water leakage disclosure. Accounting and Business Research, 45(6–7), 801–840. https://doi.org/10.1080/00014788.2015.1081554
  9. Corazza, L., Truant, E., Scagnelli, S. D., & Mio, C. (2020). Sustainability reporting after the Costa Concordia disaster: A multi-theory study on legitimacy, impression management and image restoration. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 33(8), 1909–1941. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-05-2018-3488
  10. Courtis, J. K. (2004). Corporate report obfuscation: Artefact or phenomenon?. The British Accounting Review, 36(3), 291–312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2004.03.005
  11. Di Tullio, P., La Torre, M., Dumay, J., & Rea, M. A. (2021). Accountingisation and the narrative (re)turn of business model information in corporate reporting. Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change, 18(4), 592–615. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAOC-09-2020-0144
  12. European Parliament and the Council. (2022, December 14). Directive (EU) 2022/2464 amending Regulation (EU) No 537/2014, Directive 2004/109/EC, Directive 2006/43/EC and Directive 2013/34/EU, as regards corporate sustainability reporting. Retrieved from: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2022/2464/oj
  13. European sustainability reporting standards (ESRS). Retrieved from: https://xbrl.efrag.org/e-esrs/esrs-set1-2023.html#d1e134-3-1
  14. Goffman, E. (1956). The presentation of self in everyday life. University of Edinburgh.
  15. Hooghiemstra, R. (2000). Corporate communication and impression management – New perspectives why companies engage in corporate social reporting. Journal of Business Ethics, 27(1/2), 55–68. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006400707757
  16. Lai, A., Melloni, G., & Stacchezzini, R. (2018). Integrated reporting and narrative accountability: The role of preparers. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 31(5), 1381–1405. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-08-2016-2674
  17. Łada, M., Kozarkiewicz, A., Haslam, J., Kabalska, A., & Mueller, F. (2025). Organizational altercasting: Developing impression management and cyber-risk disclosures. Contemporary Accounting Research, 42(3), 1929–1959. https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.13056
  18. Leventis, S., & Weetman, P. (2004). Impression management: Dual language reporting and voluntary disclosure. Accounting Forum, 28(3), 307–328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accfor.2004.07.004
  19. Martínez-Ferrero, J., Suárez-Fernández, O., & García-Sánchez, I. (2018). Obfuscation versus enhancement as corporate social responsibility disclosure strategies. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 25(2), 468–480. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1697
  20. Merkl-Davies, D. M., & Brennan, N. M. (2007). Discretionary disclosure strategies in corporate narratives: Incremental information or impression management?. Journal of Accounting Literature, 26, 116–194. Retrieved from: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1089447
  21. Mezzanotte, F. E. (2023). Corporate sustainability reporting: Double materiality, impacts, and legal risk. Journal of Corporate Law Studies, 23(2), 633–663. https://doi.org/10.1080/14735970.2024.2319058
  22. Michelon, G., Pilonato, S., & Ricceri, F. (2014). CSR reporting practices and the quality of disclosure: An empirical analysis. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 33, 59–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2014.10.003
  23. Michelon, G., Trojanowski, G., & Sealy, R. (2021). Narrative reporting: State of the art and future challenges. Accounting in Europe, 18(1), 7–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449480.2021.1900582
  24. Neu, D., Warsame, H., & Pedwell, K. (1998). Managing public impressions: Environmental disclosures in annual reports. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 23(3), 265–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0361-3682(97)00008-1
  25. Papathanassiou, C., & Nieto, M. J. (2025). Different shades of green: EU corporate disclosure rules and their effectiveness in limiting “greenwashing”. ECB Occasional Paper, (2025/370). https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5179587
  26. Stacchezzini, R., Melloni, G., & Lai, A. (2016). Sustainability management and reporting: The role of integrated reporting for communicating corporate sustainability management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 136, 102–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.01.109