e-ISSN 2518-1181
DOI 10.33146/2518-1181
Online Media ID R40-06293
← Back Published: 30.10.2025

The Effectiveness of Single Customs Territory Risk Management in Enhancing Cross-Border Trade: A Case of Holili Border, Tanzania

Authors

Gilbert Mchase Mwenge Catholic University, Moshi, Tanzania ORCID 0009-0003-4339-5575
Nyanjige Mayala Mwenge Catholic University, Moshi, Tanzania ORCID 0000-0003-4468-3950
Safari Majondo Mwenge Catholic University, Moshi, Tanzania ORCID 0000-0002-3575-9979

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33146/2518-1181-2025-3(109)-185-198

Abstract

Implementation of the Single Customs Territory (SCT) in Tanzania, particularly at strategic points like the Holili border, continues to face significant challenges due to various risk factors that hinder the efficiency and effectiveness of cross-border trade. Despite the application of the SCT framework, risks related to compliance, security, and financial management remain persistent obstacles to trade facilitation. This study aims to assess the effectiveness of SCT risk management in enhancing cross-border trade by examining the influence of compliance, security, and financial risks. A convergent research design with a mixed approach was employed. The sample size of 200 respondents was selected using a convenience sampling technique. The data was collected through a structured questionnaire. The instrument was ensured through expert review, while reliability was confirmed with a Cronbach’s alpha coefficient of 0.846, indicating a high level of internal consistency suitable for data collection. Multiple linear regression analysis was used for data analysis. Testing the research hypothesis showed that managing the three risk factors (compliance risk, security risk, and financial risk) has a statistically significant and positive influence on cross-border trade, with financial risk management emerging as the most dominant predictor. In particular, effective compliance measures ensuring accurate documentation and adherence to trade regulations facilitate smoother trade processes. Similarly, strengthened security mechanisms, such as cargo scanning and tracking technologies, minimize disruptions and delays. Most notably, robust financial risk management practices significantly reduce fraudulent practices, build trust among trading parties, and improve the overall integrity and efficiency of trade operations. These findings affirm the importance of an integrated risk management approach in improving cross-border trade outcomes. The Tanzania Revenue Authority and relevant regional bodies should prioritize capacity building in financial oversight and deploy advanced monitoring tools to mitigate identified risks and optimize SCT performance. In addition, the results of this research may help improve the risk management system of single customs territories in other countries.

Keywords

cross-border trade, compliance risk, security risk, financial risk, risk management, trade facilitation
References
  1. Anouche, M., & Boumaaz, Y. (2019). Customs risk management in developing countries: Foresight approach using big data. International Journal of Innovation and Applied Studies, 26, 58-68.
  2. Borysenko, O., Vasyl’yeva, O., Katerna, O., Masiuk, I., & Panakhi, O. (2022). Modeling the Risks of the Global Customs Space. Journal of Risk and Financial Management. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm15120598
  3. Controller and Auditor General. (2021). Performance audit report on the efficiency of customs procedures in facilitating trade at border posts. National Audit Office of Tanzania. Retrieved from: https://www.nao.go.tz/en/reports
  4. Czermińska, M. (2021). Institutional architecture of security in the cross-border trade in goods of the European Union, with particular emphasis on customs administrations. Roczniki Administracji i Prawa. https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0015.8299
  5. East African Business Council (EABC). (2021). Trade Facilitation in the East African Community: Challenges and Opportunities. Arusha, Tanzania: EABC Secretariat.
  6. East African Business Council. (2020). Report on customs compliance and trade facilitation in the EAC region. East African Business Council. Retrieved from: https://www.eabc-online.com/publications/customs-compliance-2020
  7. East African Community (EAC) Secretariat. (2022). Report on the implementation of single customs territory. Retrieved from: https://www.eac.int
  8. Field, A. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS Statistics (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
  9. Grainger, A. (2018). The role of customs procedures in facilitating trade in the European Union. Journal of International Trade Law and Policy, 17(1), 3–19. https://doi.org/10.1108/JITLP-08-2017-0037
  10. Gujarati, D. N., & Porter, D. C. (2009). Basic econometrics (5th ed.). McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
  11. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2019). Multivariate data analysis (8th ed.). Cengage Learning.
  12. Hillberry, R., Karabay, B., & Tan, S. (2021). Risk management in border inspection. Behavioral & Experimental Economics eJournal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3877695
  13. Holton, G. A. (1996). Value-at-Risk: Theory and practice [White paper]. Contingency Analysis. Retrieved from: http://www.glynholton.com
  14. Huang, K. (2025). Applications of the management strategies of supply chain risks in cross border business. Frontiers in Business, Economics and Management. https://doi.org/10.54097/a0zq3k89
  15. Kagira, E. K., & Wanjau, K. L. (2017). Customs modernization and its impact on trade facilitation in East Africa. East African Journal of Trade and Integration, 5(1), 22–35.
  16. Karingi, S., & Perez, R. (2018). Trade facilitation and the Single Customs Territory in the East African Community: Progress and challenges. United Nations Economic Commission for Africa. Retrieved from: https://www.uneca.org/publications/sct-eac-2018
  17. Kenya Revenue Authority (KRA). (2025). SCT Performance Report: Transforming Regional Trade Logistics. Nairobi: KRA Publications.
  18. Malawi Revenue Authority. (2023). Cross-Border Customs Cooperation with Tanzania: Progress Report. Lilongwe: MRA.
  19. Mariano, R. A., & Abesamis, K. A. (2020). Assessing the impact of trade facilitation measures using OECD indicators in ASEAN. Journal of Asian Economics, 71, 101245.
  20. Mohapatra, S. C., & Chamola, S. K. (2020). Sampling in research series 1: basic concepts in estimating sample size. Journal of Advanced Research in Medical Science & Technology, 7(1), 17–21. https://doi.org/10.24321/2394.6539.202003
  21. Mpakaniye, J. (2020). Effect of EAC single customs territory on trade facilitation in Rwanda [Unpublished study/report].
  22. Musila, J. M. (2020). Managing security threats under the Single Customs Territory: The role of data integration and personnel coordination. Journal of Regional Security and Trade, 8(2), 55–68.
  23. Muthui, J., & Moyi, E. (2018). Assessment of financial control mechanisms under the Single Customs Territory in East African Community member states. East African Journal of Public Finance, 6(1), 30–47.
  24. Nguvava, A., & Ulomi, J. (2024). The role of legal frameworks and technology in the success of the Single Customs Territory between Tanzania and Kenya. East African Trade Review, 12(2), 45–60.
  25. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2023). Customs risk management: Current trends and future outlook. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org
  26. PwC Tanzania. (2025). Tanzania Customs operations and risk management developments. PricewaterhouseCoopers. Retrieved from: https://www.pwc.com/tz/en/publications/customs-risk-management-2025.html
  27. Samy, T. (2005). Research Methods and Writing Research Proposals, Faculty of Communication, Cairo University.
  28. Tanzania Revenue Authority (TRA). (2023). Annual customs and excise report. Retrieved from: https://www.tra.go.tz
  29. The Citizen. (2025). Stakeholders call for greater engagement in SCT reforms. Dar es Salaam: The Citizen Newspaper.
  30. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD). (2022). World trade report: Facilitating cross-border trade. Retrieved from: https://unctad.org
  31. United Republic of Tanzania (URT). (2025). Quarterly economic bulletin: September 2024. Bank of Tanzania. Retrieved from: https://www.bot.go.tz/Publications/QuarterlyEconomicBulletin/2024
  32. Wang, N., Wu, G., Rong, J., Yan, Z., Yue, Q., Hu, J., & Zhang, Y. (2023). Cross-border data security from the perspective of risk assessment. In: Advances in cross-border data governance (pp. 91–104). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-7032-2_6
  33. Wei, Q. (2025). Cross-border trade risk prediction model based on support vector machine. Journal of Computational Methods in Sciences and Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1177/14727978251323130
  34. World Bank. (2016). Customs modernization: Addressing financial constraints to improve institutional effectiveness. World Bank Publications. Retrieved from: https://documents.worldbank.org/en/
  35. World Bank. (2020). Creating a secure logistics environment to enhance trade competitiveness and operational efficiency. World Bank Publications. Retrieved from: https://documents.worldbank.org/en/
  36. World Bank. (2023). Doing business in East Africa: Border efficiency and trade facilitation. Retrieved from: https://www.worldbank.org
  37. World Customs Organization (WCO). (2024). WCO Guidelines on Integrated Risk Management. Brussels: World Customs Organization.
  38. Zefferer, T., Prunster, B., Kollmann, C., Corici, A., Alber, L., Czerny, R., & Podgorelec, B. (2023). A security-evaluation framework for mobile cross-border e-government solutions. In: Proceedings of the 24th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research. https://doi.org/10.1145/3598469.3598529