e-ISSN 2518-1181
DOI 10.33146/2518-1181
Online Media ID R40-06293
← Back Published: 30.10.2025

Uncertainty as a Determinant of Risk in Security-Oriented Management of Ukrainian Commercial Banks

Authors

Anastasiia Poltorak Mykolayiv National Agrarian University, Mykolayiv, Ukraine ORCID 0000-0002-9752-9431
Andrii Ahafonov Mykolayiv National Agrarian University, Mykolayiv, Ukraine ORCID 0009-0004-7480-0163

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33146/2518-1181-2025-3(109)-139-148

Abstract

Today, commercial banks in Ukraine operate in an unstable financial environment and geopolitical challenges, which necessitate adapting traditional risk management models and integrating new methods for assessing uncertainty that consider the stochastic nature of economic processes and the psychological and behavioral characteristics of market participants. This research aims to identify and substantiate the features of the impact of uncertainty on risk management processes in the system of security-oriented functioning of commercial banks and to develop methodical approaches to increasing their stability and efficiency in the modern financial environment. The research methodology is represented by decision-making theory methods, including expert and analytical assessments, fuzzy logic methods, multi-criteria analysis, and construction of decision matrices considering various event scenarios. The article develops an Integrated Bank Security Decision Index (IBSDI), which allows quantitatively assessing the effectiveness of management decisions in banks, taking into account ten main types of uncertainty: geopolitical, regulatory, cybersecurity, stochastic, information, uncertainty of operating conditions, antagonistic, strategic goals, reputational, and other types of uncertainty. The index considers the weight of each type of uncertainty for corporate security, threats’ intensity, and banking decisions’ stability. The study results show that integrating economic, regulatory, information, and security components into a single assessment system increases the adaptability of banks, minimizes risks, and strengthens stability in crisis and uncertain conditions. The proposed method provides the basis for expert assessment, scenario analysis, and strategic planning, consistent with the international standards Basel III/IV and the practices of leading world banks. To ensure the reliability and practical effectiveness of the model, it is necessary to regularly update its parameters and check the consistency of expert assessments.

Keywords

security-oriented management, security-oriented governance, commercial bank management, commercial banks, financial management, risk management, risk governance
References
  1. Board of the National Bank of Ukraine. (2018). On the approval of the Regulation on the organization of the risk management system in banks of Ukraine and banking groups (Resolution dated June 11, 2018, No. 64). Retrieved from: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/v0064500-18#n16 [in Ukrainian]
  2. Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. (2000). On banks and banking activity: Law of Ukraine No. 2121-III. Retrieved from: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/card/2121-14 [in Ukrainian]
  3. Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. (1999). On the National Bank of Ukraine: Law of Ukraine No. 679-XIV. Retrieved from: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/card/679-14 [in Ukrainian]
  4. Board of the National Bank of Ukraine. (2019). On the approval of the Regulation on the organization of the internal control system in banks of Ukraine and banking groups. Retrieved from: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/v0088500-19#n6 [in Ukrainian]
  5. Board of the National Bank of Ukraine. (2016). On the approval of the Regulation on the determination by banks of Ukraine of the amount of credit risk for active banking operations. Retrieved from: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/v0351500-16#Text [in Ukrainian]
  6. Board of the National Bank of Ukraine. (2009). On the approval of the Methodological Recommendations regarding the procedure for stress testing in banks of Ukraine. Retrieved from: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/v0460500-09#Text [in Ukrainian]
  7. Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. (2023). Core principles for effective banking supervision. Retrieved from: https://www.bis.org/bcbs/publ/d551.pdf
  8. Canepa, F., & Aguado, J. (2025). ECB supervisors focus on risks from tariffs to cyber attacks, central bank sources say. Reuters. Retrieved from: https://www.clipr.cc/fzqL9
  9. Supervisory Board of the European Central Bank. (n.d.). Supervisory priorities 2025-27. Retrieved from: https://www.clipr.cc/sCJ5h
  10. International Organization for Standardization. (2018). ISO 31000:2018 – Risk management – Guidelines. Retrieved from: https://www.iso.org/standard/65694.html#lifecycle
  11. Knight, F. H. (2012). Risk, uncertainty and profit. Mineola, NY: Dover Publications.
  12. Reshetylo, V. P., & Fedotova, Y. V. (2020). Uncertainty and risk: Relationship of concepts and specifics of decision-making. Problems of System Approach in Economics, 3(2), 149–154. https://doi.org/10.32782/2520-2200/2020-3-41 [in Ukrainian]
  13. Kabachenko, D. V. (2017). Managerial decision-making under uncertainty and risk. Economic Bulletin, (2), 107–115. Retrieved from: https://ev.nmu.org.ua/docs/2017/2/EV20172_107-115.pdf [in Ukrainian]
  14. Krykliy, O. A., & Moskalenko, A. O. (2020). The impact of uncertainty on the liquidity of the banking system of Ukraine. Effective Economics, (11). https://doi.org/10.32702/2307-2105-2020.11.57 [in Ukrainian]
  15. Dautović, E., Gambacorta, L., & Reghezza, A. (2023). Supervisory policy stimulus: Evidence from the euro area dividend recommendation. BIS Working Papers, No. 108. Retrieved from: https://www.bis.org/publ/work1085.htm
  16. Saaty, T. L., & Vargas, L. (2022). Models, methods, concepts & applications of the Analytic Hierarchy Process (2nd ed.). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1016/0270-0255(87)90473-8
  17. Poltorak, A., & Ahafonov, A. (2025). Conceptual foundations for evaluating the effectiveness of security-oriented management in commercial banks. Investments: Practice and Experience, 4, 32–41. https://doi.org/10.32702/2306-6814.2025.4.32
  18. Poltorak, A. S., Kazemirchik, M. S., & Polishchuk, A. I. (2020). Priority threats to financial security under transformational processes in the modern economy. Modern Economics, 24, 157–163. https://doi.org/10.31521/modecon.V24(2020)-25 [in Ukrainian]
  19. Poltorak, A. S. (2020). Theoretical conceptualization of the state’s financial security. Financial Space, 4, 27–37. https://doi.org/10.18371/fp.4(40).2020.221669 [in Ukrainian]