e-ISSN 2518-1181
DOI 10.33146/2518-1181
Online Media ID R40-06293
← Back Published: 30.10.2025

New Methods for Accounting Research of the Narrative Component of Sustainable Reporting: Challenges and Opportunities

Authors

Serhii Lehenchuk Zhytomyr Polytechnic State University, Zhytomyr, Ukraine ORCID 0000-0002-3975-1210
Olha Fedorova Zhytomyr Polytechnic State University, Zhytomyr, Ukraine ORCID 0000-0002-8759-0984

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33146/2518-1181-2025-3(109)-31-40

Abstract

Today, the Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting Directive (CSRD) defines the direction of accounting transformation. Its implementation is accompanied by the adoption of new ESRS standards, which establish more detailed and quantifiable reporting requirements, necessitating the development of methods capable of combining the analysis of financial indicators with the study of narratives. The purpose of the article is to analyze the methodological challenges and new opportunities for accounting science that have arisen as a result of the development of sustainability reporting with a predominant narrative component, as well as to justify the need to hybridize methodological tools and competencies of accounting researchers to study this new phenomenon effectively. The main emphasis in the study is on the “narrative turn” – the transition from traditional financial reporting to reporting with a predominant narrative component, which reveals the impact of the enterprise on ESG aspects. This change requires a fundamental rethinking of scientific research methodology in accounting. The study’s results indicate that digitalizing reporting and using Big Data tools create new opportunities and risks associated with information overload for users and the need to verify the reliability of large volumes of narrative information. The article offers an overview of methods for analyzing accounting narratives of sustainability reporting (content analysis, natural language processing, linguistic techniques) necessary to assess their qualitative and quantitative parameters. The inevitability of hybridization of the competencies of accounting researchers and the expansion of the subject of accounting science through integration with sociology, linguistics, and communication theories was substantiated. According to the constitutive theory, accounting narratives of sustainability reporting confirm the understanding of accounting as a socio-economic institution and institutional practice. The analysis of the “narrative turn” implemented through the implementation of CSRD allowed for the identification of the challenges that need to be recognized, analyzed, and overcome by accounting researchers.

Keywords

sustainability reporting, narrative component, accounting narratives, accounting research methods, CSRD
References
  1. Bay, C. (2012). Making accounting matter: a study of the constitutive practices of accounting framers. Doctoral thesis. Uppsala universitet. Retrieved from: https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:516670/FULLTEXT01.pdf
  2. Beattie, V. (2014). Accounting narratives and the narrative turn in accounting research: Issues, theory, methodology, methods and a research framework. The British Accounting Review, 46(2), 111–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2014.05.001
  3. Czajkowska, K., Masztalerz, M., & Rep, A. (2021). Narrative reporting. In: Remlein, M. (ed.) Accounting challenges for sustainability and innovations. pp. 45–60. https://doi.org/10.18559/978-83-8211-055-5
  4. European Parliament and the Council. (2022). Directive (EU) 2022/2464 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 December 2022 amending Regulation (EU) No 537/2014, Directive 2004/109/EC, Directive 2006/43/EC and Directive 2013/34/EU, as regards corporate sustainability reporting. Retrieved from: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32022L2464
  5. EFRAG. (2024). EFRAG IG 3: List of ESRS datapoints – Explanatory note. Retrieved from: https://www.efrag.org/sites/default/files/sites/webpublishing/SiteAssets/EFRAG%20IG%203%20List%20of%20ESRS%20Data%20Points%20-%20Explanatory%20Note.pdf
  6. Ferjančič, U., Ichev, R., Lončarski, I., Montariol, S., Pelicon, A., Pollak, S., ... & Žnidaršič, M. (2024). Textual analysis of corporate sustainability reporting and corporate ESG scores. International Review of Financial Analysis, 96, 103669. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2024.103669
  7. Grippo, V., Mazzarella, F., & Di Piazza, A. (2025). A new paradigm in corporate reporting: The Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD). Economia pubblica: LII, 1, 2025, 137–146. https://doi.org/10.3280/EP2025-001006
  8. Herhausen, D., Ludwig, S., Abedin, E., Haque, N. U., & de Jong, D. (2025). From words to Insights: Text analysis in business research. Journal of Business Research, 198, 115491. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115491
  9. Huang, J., Wang, D. D., & Wang, Y. (2024). Textual Attributes of Corporate Sustainability Reports and ESG Ratings. Sustainability, 16(21), 9270. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16219270
  10. Kuhn, T. S. (1996). The structure of scientific revolutions. 3rd ed. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226458106.001.0001
  11. Lewis, C., & Young, S. (2019). Fad or future? Automated analysis of financial text and its implications for corporate reporting. Accounting and Business Research, 49(5), 587–615. https://doi.org/10.1080/00014788.2019.1611730
  12. Llewellyn, S. (1999). Narratives in accounting and management research. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 12(2), 220–237. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513579910270129
  13. Mangiuc, M. D., & Kagitci, M. (2025). CSRD as a Paradigm Shift in Sustainability Reporting: From Voluntary Practice to Legal Requirement. Amfiteatru Economic, 27(70), 1193–1208. https://doi.org/10.24818/EA/2025/70/1193
  14. Martinčević, I., Primorac, D., & Dorić, B. (2024). Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD): Obligations, Challenges and Requirements for Companies. ENTRENOVA-ENTerprise REsearch InNOVAtion, 10(1), 317–327. https://doi.org/10.54820/entrenova-2024-0026
  15. Merkl-Davies, D., Brennan, N., & Vourvachis, P. (2011). Text analysis methodologies in corporate narrative reporting research. 23rd CSEAR International Colloquium. St Andrews. Retrieved from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/267725687_Text_Analysis_Methodologies_in_Corporate_Narrative_Reporting_Research/citations
  16. Michelon, G., Trojanowski, G., & Sealy, R. (2022). Narrative reporting: State of the art and future challenges. Accounting in Europe, 19(1), 7–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449480.2021.1900582
  17. Nielsen, C., & Bukh, P. N. (2013). Communicating Strategy: using the business model as a platform for investor relations work. The Business Model Community Working Paper Series, 2013-10. Retrieved from: http://www.pnbukh.com/Files/Files/Udgivne%20artikler/bpmp4-BM_Community_WP_10.pdf
  18. Operato, L., Gallo, A., Marino, E. A. E., & Mattioli, D. (2025). Navigating CSRD reporting: Turning compliance into sustainable development with science-based metrics. Environmental Development, 54, 101138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envdev.2025.101138
  19. Pombinho, M., Fialho, A., & Novas, J. (2024). Readability of sustainability reports: A bibliometric analysis and systematic literature review. Sustainability, 16(1), 260. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16010260
  20. Sharma, R. (2025). Unveiling the effects of the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) on company sustainability reporting practices: a case of German companies. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal. https://doi.org/10.1108/SAMPJ-01-2025-0091
  21. European Commission. (2023). Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2023/2772 of 31 July 2023 supplementing Directive 2013/34/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards sustainability reporting standards (Text with EEA relevance). Official Journal of the European Union. Retrieved from: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=OJ:L_202302772
  22. Van Dijk, L., Hijink, S., & In ’t Veld, L. (2024). Corporate Sustainability Reporting. In: Busch, D., Ferrarini, G. and Grünewald, S. (eds.) Sustainable Finance in Europe. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 185–210. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-53696-0_6
  23. Vourvachis, P., & Woodward, T. (2015). Content analysis in social and environmental reporting research: trends and challenges. Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 16(2), 166–195. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAAR-04-2013-0027