e-ISSN 2518-1181
DOI 10.33146/2518-1181
Online Media ID R40-06293
← Back Published: 30.03.2025

Types of Non-Financial Performance Measures Prevalent for Top 40 Companies Listed on the Johannesburg Securities Exchange

Authors

Witness Siwela University of South Africa, Pretoria, South Africa ORCID 0009-0000-4414-2332
Peter N Kamala Pilon School of Business, Sheridan College Institute of Technology and Advanced Learning, Mississauga, Canada

DOI:

https://doi.org/ 10.33146/2307-9878-2025-1(107)-160-170

Abstract

In the past decade, many companies have begun to make greater use of non-financial performance measures, which are believed to affect profitability ultimately. The attention to these non-financial metrics is in sync with the global trend of companies embracing sustainable corporate practices. This ascendancy of non-financial metrics entails that companies obtain a glimpse of their progress in real-time before a financial verdict is pronounced and the soundness of their investment allocations has become moot. However, prior studies show that most companies have made little attempt to identify types of non-financial performance that might advance their chosen strategy. This article aims to analyze the balanced scorecard’s non-financial perspectives to unveil the most prevalent non-financial performance measures companies employ in South Africa. The study used a quantitative research paradigm and multiple case study design to empirically analyze the Top 40 companies listed on the Johannesburg Securities Exchange (JSE). Data were collected using the content analysis technique in congruence with the adopted research approach. A census approach was employed to select a sample to enhance the accuracy of the results. Accordingly, we drew snapshot data from Integrated Annual Reports (IARs) and Sustainability Reports (SRs) for analysis using a Control list and a Judgement scale. The results revealed that the sampled companies employed all three types of non-financial performance measures related to the non-financial perspectives of the balanced scorecard. Thus, out of the 34 performance measures listed, only two were not utilized by any of the sampled companies. The study’s findings are expected to improve the quality of decisions made by the JSE-listed companies and their stakeholders by encouraging the use of the balanced scorecard approach to integrated reporting. Moreover, this study fills in the gap in research on the non-financial performance measurement practices of companies listed on the JSE.

Keywords

non-financial performance, sustainability, control list, integrated annual reports, contingency theory, balanced scorecard, financial measures
References
  1. Abogazia, A. H., Hashim, H. A., Salleh, Z., & Ettish, A. A. (2022). The moderating effect of external financing on the relationship between integrated reporting and firm value in Egypt. Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting, 22(5), 1380-1409. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/JFRA-05-2022-0195
  2. Ali, M. N., Hameedi, K. S. & Almagtome, A. H. (2019). Does sustainability reporting via accounting information system influence investment decisions in Iraq?. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 9(9), 294–312.
  3. Arora, A. & Sharma, D. (2022). Do Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) Performance Scores Reduce the Cost of Debt? Evidence from Indian firms. Australasian Business, Accounting and Finance Journal, 16(5), 4–18. https://doi.org/10.14453/aabfj.v16i5.02
  4. Bauer, R. & Hann, D. (2012). Corporate Environmental Management and Credit Risk. SSRN Electronic Journal, 1(1), 1–43. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1660470
  5. Butler, J. B., Henderson, S. C. & Raiborn, C. (2011). Sustainability and the Balanced Scorecard: Integrating Green Measures into Business Reporting. Management Accounting Quarterly, 12(2), 1–10.
  6. Carels, C., Maroun, W. & Padia, N. (2016). Percepção da população assistida sobre a inserção de estudantes de medicina na Unidade Básica de Saúde. Trabalho de conclusão de curso, 1(9), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
  7. Cowen, S. S., Ferreri, L. B. & Parker, L. D. (1987). The impact of corporate characteristics on social responsibility disclosure: A typology and frequency-based analysis. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 12(2), 111–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(87)90001-8
  8. De Villiers, C., Rinaldi, L. & Unerman, J. (2014). Integrated reporting: Insights, gaps and an agenda for future research. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 27(7), 1042–1067. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-06-2014-1736
  9. Dragu, I. & Tudor-Tiron, A. (2013). New corporate reporting trends. Analysis on the evolution of Integrated Reporting. Annals of the university of Oradea, Economic Science Series, 22(1), 1221–1228. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13398-014-0173-7.2
  10. Dragu, I.-M. & Tiron-Tudor, A. (2013). GRI compliance and prerequisites of Integrated Reporting for Asian-Pacific companies. Annales Universitatis Apulensis Series Oeconomica, 15(2), 432–442.
  11. EY (2013). Integrated Reporting. EY Point of View, 1(1), 4. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02168-3
  12. Fakoya, M. B. & Malatji, S. E. (2020). Integrating ESG factors in investment decisions by mutual fund managers: A case of selected Johannesburg Stock Exchange-listed companies. Investment Management and Financial Innovations, 17(4), 258–270. https://doi.org/10.21511/imfi.17(4).2020.23
  13. Hanafi, R. A. (2006). An exploration of corporate social and environmental disclosure in Egypt and the UK: a comparative study. PhD thesis. Retrieved from http://theses.gla.ac.uk/1536/
  14. Hibbitt, C. & Collison, D. (2004). Corporate environmental disclosure and reporting developments in Europe. Social and Environmental Accountability Journal, 24(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969160X.2004.9651708
  15. Hindley, T. & Buys, P. W. (2012). Integrated Reporting Compliance With the Global Reporting Initiative Framework: An Analysis of the South African Mining Industry. International Business & Economics Research Journal (IBER), 11(11), 1249. https://doi.org/10.19030/iber.v11i11.7372
  16. Holsti, O. (1969). Content analysis for the social sciences and humanities. London: Addison-Wesley.
  17. Hui, C., Foxcroft, L. C., Richardson, D. M., & MacFadyen, S. (2011). Defining optimal sampling effort for large‐scale monitoring of invasive alien plants: a Bayesian method for estimating abundance and distribution. Journal of Applied Ecology, 48(3), 768-776. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2011.01974.x
  18. Jose, A. & Lee, S. (2006). Environmental Reporting of Global Corporations- A Content Analysis based on Website Disclosures Ó Springer. Journal of Business Ethics, 1(72), 307–321.
  19. Kamala, P. N. (2014). The decision-usefulness of corporate environmental reports in South Africa. Phd Thesis. Retrieved from https://core.ac.uk/download/43176922.pdf
  20. Kamala, P. N., Wingard, C., & Cronjé, C. (2016). Users' corporate environmental information needs. South African Journal of Economic and Management Sciences, 19(4), 579-591. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajems.v19i4.1312
  21. Kamala, P. N., Wingard, H. C. & Cronje, C. J. (2015). Evolution of corporate environmental reports in South Africa. Journal of Accounting and Management, 5(2), 31–34.
  22. Kordsachia, O., Focke, M. & Velte, P. (2022). Do sustainable institutional investors contribute to firms’ environmental performance? Empirical evidence from Europe. Review of Managerial Science, 16(5), 1409–1436. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-021-00484-7
  23. KPMG (2017). The KPMG Survey of Corporate Responsibility Reporting 2017: The road ahead. KPMG’s Global Center of Excellence for Climate Change and Sustainability, 1(1), 1–57. https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2013.238
  24. Krippendorff, K. & Weber, R. P. (1987). Basic Content Analysis. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 82(397), 354-355. https://doi.org/10.2307/2289192
  25. Kuzey, C. & Uyar, A. (2017). Determinants of sustainability reporting and its impact on firm value: Evidence from the emerging market of Turkey. Journal of Cleaner Production, 143(1), 27–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.153
  26. MacNeil, I., & Esser, I. M. (2022). From a financial to an entity model of ESG. European Business Organization Law Review, 23(1), 9-45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40804-021-00234-y
  27. Makiwane, T. S. & Padia, N. (2013). Evaluation of corporate integrated reporting in South Africa post King III release South Africa – An Exploratory Enquiry. Journal of Economic and Financial Sciences, 6(2), 421–438. https://doi.org/10.3149/fth.1003.257
  28. Pineno, C. J. (2013). Sustainability Reporting By Universities and Corporations: an Integrated Approach or a Separate Category Within the Balanced Scorecard. Journal of Business & Accounting, 6(1), 51–64.
  29. PWC (2014). The value creation journe: A survey of JSE Top-40 companies’ integrated reports. Brunei – History, Islam, Society and Contemporary Issues, 01–44. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt19705fq.3
  30. Rashid, Y., Rashid, A., Warraich, M. A., Sabir, S. S., & Waseem, A. (2019). Case study method: A step-by-step guide for business researchers. International journal of qualitative methods, 18, 1609406919862424. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406919862424
  31. Reverte, C. (2020). Do investors value the voluntary assurance of sustainability information? Evidence from the Spanish stock market. Sustainable Development, 1(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2157
  32. Solomon, J., & Maroun, W. (2012). Integrated reporting: The new face of social, ethical and environmental reporting in South Africa. London: The Association of Chartered Certified Accountants. Retrieved from https://www.accaglobal.com/content/dam/acca/global/PDF-technical/integrated-reporting/tech-tp-iirsa.pdf
  33. Steyn, M. (2014). Organisational benefits and implementation challenges of mandatory integrated reporting: Perspectives of senior executives at South African listed companies. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 5(4), 476–503. https://doi.org/10.1108/sampj-11-2013-0052
  34. Van Zyl, A. S. (2013). Sustainability And Integrated Reporting In The South African Corporate Sector. International Business & Economics Research Journal, 12(8). Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10019.1/85279
  35. Wingard, H. C. & Vorster, Q. (2001). Financial performance of environmentally responsible South African listed companies. Meditari Accountancy Research, 9(April), 313–332.
  36. Wolfe, R. (1991). The use of content analysis to assess corporate social responsibility. In J. E. Post (Ed.), Research in Corporate Social Performance and Policy, 12, 281-308.
  37. Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research design and methods. CJPE, 28(1), 61–103. https://doi.org/10.3138/CJPE.BR-240
  38. Zhou, S., Simmett, R. & Green, W. (2017). Does integrated reporting matter to the capital market?. Abucus, 53(1), 94–132. https://doi.org/10.1111/abac.12104