e-ISSN 2518-1181
DOI 10.33146/2518-1181
Online Media ID R40-06293
← Back Published: 30.03.2025

Navigating Global Transfer Pricing: Contemporary Regulations and Their Impact on Intercompany Transactions

Authors

Cornelia Nastase Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania ORCID 0009-0006-6501-7964

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33146/2307-9878-2025-1(107)-69-78

Abstract

With the increasing scrutiny of multinational corporations’ tax strategies, organizations such as the OECD have introduced regulatory measures to curb Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS). This article aims to explore the evolving regulatory landscape of global transfer pricing and its impact on intercompany transactions. The study examines key elements, including the OECD BEPS Action Plan, the arm’s length principle, and Advance Pricing Agreements (APAs), assessing their effectiveness in fostering tax compliance and fairness. A particular focus is given to challenges the digital economy poses, where the mobility of intangible assets complicates traditional tax structures. The study also explores the role of bilateral and multilateral tax agreements in mitigating tax avoidance and facilitating cross-border cooperation. Additionally, it assesses the effectiveness of dispute resolution mechanisms in ensuring compliance without hindering global business operations. The study results provide a better understanding of how hybrid arrangements, controlled foreign companies (CFCs), and interest deductibility rules shape corporate tax behaviour. Recent developments analyzed in the work, including the OECD’s 2023 update on digital economy taxation and the European Commission’s latest transfer pricing report, underscore the necessity for adaptive and harmonized global tax regulations. While BEPS measures have led to increased information exchange and corporate tax compliance, loopholes persist, particularly in developing economies, which remain vulnerable to aggressive tax planning. The rise of complex financial instruments and multinational tax structures further complicates enforcement, requiring continuous global tax governance framework updates. Thus, the findings of this study indicate that coordinated international reform is essential to prevent profit shifting, enhance tax fairness, and support sustainable economic development.

Keywords

transfer pricing, BEPS, tax compliance, international taxation, bilateral and multilateral tax agreements
References
  1. Abu, M., Bello, U., Mohammed, Z. (2020). Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS) in Low-Income Nations by the Multinationals: A Critical Review of Literature. Journal of Critical Reviews, 7(5), 502-509. https://jcreview.com/archives/volume-7/issue-5/3944
  2. Choi, J. P., Furusawa, T., & Ishikawa, J. (2020). Transfer pricing regulation and tax competition. Journal of International Economics, 127, 103367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2020.103367
  3. European Commission. (2019). Statistics on APAs in the EU at the End of 2018. European Commission, Brussels. https://taxation-customs.ec.europa.eu/document/download/c5cbb672-56aa-4099-81f5-c96bb9ffe52c_en?filename=APAs_2018_FINAL.pdf
  4. Hirshleifer, J. (1956). On the economics of transfer pricing. Journal of Business, 29 (July), 172–184. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2350664
  5. Mosquera Valderrama, I. (2014). BEPS and Aggressive Tax Planning: Are the BEPS-OECD Measures to Tackle Aggressive Tax Planning Feasible for Countries in South America and the Sub-Saharan African Region? SSRN Electronic Journal. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2528650
  6. OECD Statistical Glossary. (n.d.). OECD Statistical Glossary. Retrieved from https://stats.oecd.org/glossary/detail.asp?ID=2757
  7. OECD. (1995). Recommendation of the Council of the OECD on Improving the Quality of Government Regulation. OECD, Paris. https://legalinstruments.oecd.org/public/doc/128/128.en.pdf
  8. OECD. (1999). OECD Transfer Pricing Guidelines. OECD, Paris. https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/publications/reports/2001/06/transfer-pricing-guidelines-for-multinational-enterprises-and-tax-administrations-2001_g1ghgcb6/9789264192218-en.pdf
  9. OECD. (2006). Annual Report on the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises: Conducting Business in Weak Governance Zones. OECD, Paris. https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/publications/reports/2006/12/annual-report-on-the-oecd-guidelines-for-multinational-enterprises-2006_g1gh74fb/mne-2006-en.pdf
  10. OECD. (2015). Explanatory Statement, OECD/G20 Base Erosion and Profit Shifting Project. OECD, Paris. https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/publications/reports/2016/08/beps-project-explanatory-statement_g1g6db07/9789264263437-en.pdf
  11. OECD. (2020). Secretary-General Tax Report to G20 Finance Ministers and Central Bank Governors – July 2020. OECD, Paris. https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/publications/reports/2020/07/oecd-secretary-general-tax-report-to-g20-finance-ministers-and-central-bank-governors-saudi-arabia-july-2020_c4720cde/44e02bbe-en.pdf
  12. Podstawka, M. (2019). Transfer prices and aggressive tax optimization. Economic and Regional Studies, 12(3), 242-253. https://doi.org/10.2478/ers-2019-0022
  13. TPcases. (2019). France vs Google, September 2019, Court approval of CJIP Agreement – Google agrees to pay EUR 1 billion in fines and taxes to end Supreme Court Case. https://tpcases.com/france-vs-google-september-2019-courts-approval-of-cjip-agreement-google-pays-eur-1-billion-in-fines-and-taxes-to-end-supreme-court-casease/
  14. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. (1995). World Investment Report. United Nations, New York and Geneva. https://unctad.org/system/files/official-document/wir1995_en.pdf
  15. United Nations. (2017). Practical Manual on Transfer Pricing for Developing Countries. https://www.un.org/esa/ffd/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/Manual-TP-2017.pdf
  16. United Nations. (2020). Financing for Sustainable Development Report 2020. United Nations, New York. https://financing.desa.un.org/sites/default/files/2022-02/FSDR_2020_0.pdf
  17. World Bank. (2017). Arm's-Length Trade: A Source of Post-Crisis Trade Weakness. World Bank, Washington, D.C. http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/es/659891499793795498/pdf/WPS8144.pdf