e-ISSN 2518-1181
DOI 10.33146/2518-1181
Online Media ID R40-06293
← Back Published: 30.03.2025

The Impact of Behavioural Economics Concepts on Accounting Science

Authors

Vita Semanyuk West Ukrainian National University, Ternopil, Ukraine ORCID 0000-0001-7010-9923
Nazar Marchyshyn West Ukrainian National University, Ternopil, Ukraine ORCID 0000-0003-1680-6300

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33146/2307-9878-2025-1(107)-5-14

Abstract

The formation of information in the accounting system often depends not only on objective data but also on the subjective perception, psychological characteristics and cognitive characteristics of decision-makers. The purpose of the article is a comprehensive analysis of the influence of behavioral economics on accounting science and financial reporting through the prism of cognitive factors, information apperception and reflection. The study aims to identify the main psychological and social factors that determine the processes of managerial decisions in accounting systems. The article examines the process of forming and developing the theory of behavioural economics and behavioural accounting. The results of the study confirm that behavioural aspects of accounting significantly impact decision-making in the finance field. In particular, emotional factors play an important role in forming financial reporting, especially in times of crisis and uncertainty. In addition, cognitive biases such as anchoring, bounded rationality, and confirmation bias can distort data analysis and risk assessment. Automating accounting processes and using artificial intelligence reduce routine operations but, at the same time, create new challenges related to trust in algorithmic models. The globalization of accounting, driven by digital technologies, requires accountants to adapt to international standards such as IFRS and ESG reporting while considering cultural and behavioural differences that affect accounting practices in different countries. This study confirms the need to integrate behavioural aspects into the accounting system to increase its adaptability and reliability. Applying behavioural concepts increases the transparency of accounting information, reduces the risk of manipulation, and contributes to more effective financial management.

Keywords

accounting theory, accounting digitalization, behavioral economics, accounting system, cognitive factors, information system, managerial decisions, informational apperception, informational reflection
References
  1. Crugman, Р. (2009). How Did Economists Get It So Wrong. The NT Times. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/06/magazine/06Economic-t.html
  2. Semaniuk, V. (2018). Informatsiina teoriia obliku v postindustrialnomu suspilstvi [Information theory of accounting in post-industrial society]. Ternopil: TNEU.
  3. Kahneman, D., Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Under Risk. Econometrica, 47, 263-291.
  4. Belkaoui, A. R. (1998). Behavioral Management Accounting. Connecticut. London: QUORUM BOOKS Westport.
  5. Hrebeshkova, O., Shapran, O. (2018). Konkurentni perevahy pidpryiemstva z pozytsii povedinkovoi ekonomiky: dzherela ta sposoby utrymannia Competitive advantages of an enterprise from the perspective of behavioral economics: sources and methods of retention. Ekonomika ta pidpryiemnytstvo, 41, 45–58.
  6. Romaniv, R. (2018). Appertseptsiia informatsii v bikheviorystychnii teorii bukhhalterskoho obliku: krytyka suchasnykh pidkhodiv Information Apperception in Behavioral Accounting Theory: A Critique of Modern Approaches. Visnyk Ternopilskoho natsionalnoho ekonomichnoho universytetu, 2, 94-101.
  7. Burdenko, I. M., Korol, A. S. Bikheviorystychna teoriia ta systema bukhhalterskoho obliku Behavioral theory and accounting system. Visnyk Sumskoho derzhavnoho universytetu. Seriia Ekonomika, 4, 106-115. https://doi.org/10.21272/1817-9215.2021.4-13
  8. Le Bon, G. (1977). The Crowd. New York: Penguin Books.
  9. Simon, H. (1955). A Behavioral Model of Rational Choice. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 69, 99–118.
  10. Devine, C. T. (1960). Research Methodology and Accounting Theory Formation. The Accounting Review, July, 387–399.
  11. Hendriksen, E. S., Van Breda, M. F. (2001). Accounting Theory. 5th ed. Boston [Mass.]: McGraw-Hill.
  12. Belkaoui, A. R. (1992). Accounting theory. Academic Press.
  13. Wells, M. C. (1976). A Revolution in Accounting Thought?. The Accounting Review. July, 471-482.
  14. Vysochan, O. S., Lutsiuk, I. V. (2017). Perspektyvy vidrodzhennia bikheviorystychnykh pohliadiv na rozvytok obliku v Ukraini Prospects for the revival of behavioral views on the development of accounting in Ukraine. Naukovyi visnyk Khersonskoho derzhavnoho universytetu. Seriia: Ekonomichni nauky, 24(2), 118-122.
  15. Cressey, D. R. (1954). Differential association theory and compulsive crimes. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 45(1), 29–40.
  16. Birnberg, J. G., Shields, J. (1989). Three decades of behavioral research: A search for order. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 1, 23–74.
  17. Dickhaut, J., Basu, S., McCabe, K., Waymire, G. (2010). Neuroaccounting: Consilience between the Biologically Evolved Brain and Culturally Evolved Accounting Principles. Accounting Horizons, 24(2), 221–255.
  18. Birnberg, J. G. (2011). A Proposed Framework for Behavioral Accounting Research. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 23(1), 15–25.
  19. Lehenchuk, S. (2012). Bukhhalterske teoretychne znannia: vid teorii do metateorii Accounting theoretical knowledge: from theory to metatheory. Zhytomyr: ZhDTU.
  20. Awasthy, V., Mishra, J. (2018). Behavioural accounting: Looking at behavioural aspect to financial accounting. International Journal of Advanced Research and Development, 3(1), 690–692. Retrieved from www.advancedjournal.com
  21. Ax, C., Greve, J. (2017). Adoption of management accounting innovations: Organizational culture compatibility and perceived outcomes. Management Accounting Research, 34, 59-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2016.07.007
  22. Kutluk, F. A. (2017). Behavioral accounting and its interactions. Accounting and Corporate Reporting-Today and Tomorrow, 191-207. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.68972