e-ISSN 2518-1181
DOI 10.33146/2518-1181
Online Media ID R40-06293
← Back Published: 30.05.2026

AQI-Matrix Approach to Transforming External Inspection Results into an Audit Quality Risk Management System

Authors

Oleksii Haievskyi National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine ORCID 0009-0005-4082-3102

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33146/2518-1181-2026-2(112)-192-200

Abstract

The inspection results compiled by public oversight bodies constitute substantial evidence of recurring deficiencies in quality management systems, audit engagement performance, and compliance with legal requirements. However, without an appropriate methodological interpretation, such results often remain statements of identified deficiencies and are not always translated into a coherent system of management responses within audit firms. The article aims to substantiate an AQI-matrix approach to transforming external quality inspection results into a system for managing audit quality risk management. The research methodology includes content analysis of academic and regulatory sources, comparative analysis of audit quality assessment approaches, classification analysis of external inspection findings, analytical generalization, and matrix modeling. The article proposes a logical sequence for transforming external inspection results into identified audit quality risks, grouping them by functional levels, assessing them through AQI components, and determining appropriate management responses. The scientific novelty of the study lies in the improvement of the organizational and methodological approach to managing audit quality risk management. Unlike approaches that treat external inspection results mainly as evidence of non-compliance, the proposed approach uses them as an empirical basis for developing an AQI risk matrix, ranking risks, and prioritizing audit firm management actions. The practical significance of the results lies in the possibility of applying the proposed approach to internal monitoring of quality management systems, planning staff training, revising audit methodology, and controlling the implementation of corrective actions. The AQI-matrix approach does not replace professional judgment and should not be interpreted as a rating mechanism for audit firms; rather, it is a tool for risk prioritization and continuous improvement of audit quality management. The proposed approach also provides a basis for linking external inspection findings with internal quality management responses, including methodology revision, targeted staff training, enhanced engagement monitoring, and control over corrective actions. This makes it possible to use external oversight results not as a final statement of deficiencies, but as an input for continuous improvement of the audit firm’s quality management system.

Keywords

audit quality, audit quality risks, external inspection, AQI matrix, audit firm, quality management system, management responses
References
  1. Vasyliuk, M. M. (2020). Organization and methodology of quality control of audit services (Doctoral dissertation). Kyiv. Retrieved April 7, 2026, from: http://nasoa.edu.ua/wp-content/uploads/zah/vasyliuk_dis.pdf [in Ukrainian]
  2. Karpachova, O. V. (2023). Organizational and methodological aspects of forming auditor working papers (PhD dissertation). Lviv. Retrieved April 7, 2026, from: https://lnu.edu.ua/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/diss_Karpachova.pdf [in Ukrainian]
  3. Kudrytskyi, B. V. (2007). Methodological and organizational aspects of financial statement audit in the context of modern information technologies (Abstract of Candidate’s dissertation). Kyiv. Retrieved April 7, 2026, from: https://ir.kneu.edu.ua/items/cfa39595-f2f8-44cd-a47f-4b424c81600a [in Ukrainian]
  4. Kuzyk, N. P., Shevchuk, K. V., & Vershuta, Yu. S. (2024). Audit quality as a determinant characteristic of financial statement audit. Economy and Society, 70. https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0072/2024-70-137 [in Ukrainian]
  5. Audit Public Oversight Body of Ukraine. (2022). Report on monitoring the quality of the audit services market and competition for 2019–2020. Kyiv. Retrieved April 21, 2026, from: https://www.apob.org.ua/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/Звіт-про-моніторинг.pdf [in Ukrainian]
  6. Audit Public Oversight Body of Ukraine. (2023). Report on the activities of the Public Oversight Body of Audit Activity for 2023. Kyiv. Retrieved April 21, 2026, from: https://www.apob.org.ua/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/Звіт-про-діяльність-ОСНАД-2023.pdf [in Ukrainian]
  7. Audit Public Oversight Body of Ukraine. (2024). Report on the activities of the Public Oversight Body of Audit Activity for 2024. Kyiv. Retrieved April 21, 2026, from: https://www.apob.org.ua/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/Звіт-про-діяльність-ОСНАД-за-2024-рік-на-сайт.pdf [in Ukrainian]
  8. Riadska, V. V. (2015). Audit in the development of entrepreneurial activity in Ukraine (Doctoral dissertation). Kyiv. Retrieved April 7, 2026, from: https://kneu.edu.ua/userfiles/d-26.006.06/2015/dis_Ryadska_.pdf [in Ukrainian]
  9. Accounting and Corporate Regulatory Authority. (2025). Revised audit quality indicators framework. Singapore. Retrieved April 7, 2026, from: https://www.acra.gov.sg/news-events/news-announcements/907/
  10. Accountancy Europe. (2016). Overview of audit quality indicators initiatives. Brussels. Retrieved April 7, 2026, from: https://www.accountancyeurope.eu/wp-content/uploads/1607_Update_of_Overview_of_AQIs.pdf
  11. Bedard, J. C., Johnstone, K. M., & Smith, E. F. (2010). Audit quality indicators: A status update on possible public disclosures and insights from audit practice. Current Issues in Auditing, 4(1), C12–C19. https://doi.org/10.2308/ciia.2010.4.1.C12
  12. Center for Audit Quality. (2023). Audit quality disclosure framework. Washington. Retrieved April 7, 2026, from: https://www.thecaq.org/audit-quality-disclosure-framework
  13. Francis, J. R. (2011). A framework for understanding and researching audit quality. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 30(2), 125–152. https://doi.org/10.2308/ajpt-50006
  14. Harris, M. K., & Williams, L. T. (2020). Audit quality indicators: Perspectives from non-Big Four audit firms and small company audit committees. Advances in Accounting, 50, Article 100485. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adiac.2020.100485
  15. International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board. (2014). A framework for audit quality: Key elements that create an environment for audit quality. New York. Retrieved April 7, 2026, from: https://www.iaasb.org/publications/framework-audit-quality-key-elements-create-environment-audit-quality
  16. Knechel, W. R., Krishnan, G. V., Pevzner, M., Shefchik Bhaskar, L., & Velury, U. (2013). Audit quality: Insights from the academic literature. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 32(Suppl. 1), 385–421. https://doi.org/10.2308/ajpt-50350
  17. Martin, R. D. (2013). Audit quality indicators: Audit practice meets audit research. Current Issues in Auditing, 7(2), A17–A23. https://doi.org/10.2308/ciia-50581
  18. Public Company Accounting Oversight Board. (2015). Concept release on audit quality indicators (PCAOB Release No. 2015-005). Washington. Retrieved April 6, 2026, from: https://pcaobus.org/rulemaking/docket_041/release_2015_005.pdf
  19. Van Opijnen, M. (2016). Audit quality in a regulatory context: Empirical studies on public oversight, auditor independence, and audit quality indicators (Doctoral thesis). Maastricht University. https://doi.org/10.26481/dis.20160518mo