e-ISSN 2518-1181
DOI 10.33146/2518-1181
Online Media ID R40-06293
← Back Published: 30.05.2026

Development of the Narrative Component of Integrated Reporting

Authors

Oksana Nesterenko V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University, Kharkiv, Ukraine ORCID 0009-0007-5980-3253
Nataliia Kashchena State University of Biotechnology, Kharkiv, Ukraine ORCID 0000-0001-7069-8860

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33146/2518-1181-2026-2(112)-63-71

Abstract

Strengthening regulatory requirements for corporate transparency, the implementation of the CSRD Directive, and European integration are transforming reporting practices, significantly increasing the role of the narrative component of integrated reporting as a tool for strategic communication with stakeholders. Traditional financial reporting is increasingly unable to meet the information needs of investors, regulators, and society, who seek a holistic view of the strategic prospects, risks, and socio-environmental impacts of business entities. Instead, the narrative that allows for explaining the cause-and-effect relationships between events, conveying the strategic context, and building stakeholder trust – functions that no numerical indicator can perform. The article aims to substantiate the theoretical and methodological principles for the formation of the narrative component of integrated reporting and to identify directions for its development in the context of the transformation of corporate reporting practices and the strengthening of regulatory requirements for the disclosure of non-financial information. The research methodology includes abstract-logical, monographic, comparative methods, a systematic approach, analysis, and synthesis. The article presents a conceptual model for the formation of the narrative component of integrated reporting, which explains the logic of transforming disparate quantitative accounting data into a meaningful information base for a business entity capable of responding to stakeholders’ requests in both retrospective and prospective dimensions. Such a model ensures methodological unity among financial, environmental, social, and strategic accounting as subsystems for the formation of narrative disclosures, increases the reliability and verifiability of the report’s text content, and creates institutional prerequisites for the implementation of automated solutions based on digital technologies. Enterprises can use the results of this study to improve the quality of their integrated reporting, in particular in terms of standardization and verification of text disclosures in accordance with the requirements of ESRS and CSRD, as well as to form effective mechanisms for interaction between the accounting system and the process of preparing an integrated report in the conditions of digitalization.

Keywords

integrated reporting, narrative component, non-financial reporting, accounting system, sustainability reporting, CSRD, ESRS, stakeholders, value creation, digitalization
References
  1. Adams, C. A. (2015). The International Integrated Reporting Council: a call to action. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 27, 23–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2014.07.001
  2. Beattie, V., Dhanani, A., & Jones, M. J. (2008). Investigating presentational change in UK annual reports: a longitudinal perspective. Journal of Business Communication, 45(2), 181–222. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021943607313993
  3. Melloni, G., Caglio, A., & Perego, P. (2017). Saying more with less? Disclosure conciseness, completeness and balance in Integrated Reports. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 36(3), 220–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2017.03.001
  4. La Torre, M., Sabelfeld, S., Blomkvist, M., Tarquinio, L., & Dumay, J. (2018). Harmonising non-financial reporting regulation in Europe. Meditari Accountancy Research, 26(4), 598–621. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEDAR-02-2018-0290
  5. Dumay, J., Bernardi, C., Guthrie, J., & Demartini, P. (2016). Integrated reporting: A structured literature review. Accounting Forum, 40(3), 166–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accfor.2016.06.001
  6. Lehenchuk, S. (2025). The Narrative Component of Sustainability Reporting as a Strategic Tool of the Impression Management. Oblik i finansi, 4(110), 14–25. https://doi.org/10.33146/2518-1181-2025-4(110)-14-25 [in Ukrainian]
  7. Fedorova, O. (2025). Current trends in scientific research on sustainability reporting. Economics, Management and Administration, 3(113), 53–64. https://doi.org/10.26642/ema-2025-3(113)-53-64 [in Ukrainian]
  8. Babaiev, V., Klymenko, N., Berlizova, V., & Tymokha, D. (2025). Implementation of ESG principles in public and corporate. Theory and Practice of Public Administration, 1(80), 132–152. http://doi.org/10.26565/1727-6667-2025-1-08 [in Ukrainian]
  9. Rauschenberger, F., Gerwanski, J., & Lueg, R. (2025). How to measure Integrated Reporting Adoption, compliance, and Quality: A Systematic Review of taxonomies, constructs, and measures toward a research agenda. Management Review Quarterly, 1-57. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-025-00507-7
  10. Lai, A., Melloni, G., & Stacchezzini, R. (2018). Integrated reporting and narrative accountability: the role of preparers. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 31(5), 1381–1405. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-08-2016-2674
  11. Fedorova, O. (2026). Assessment of the completeness of enterprise corporate reporting. Economics, Management and Administration, 1(115), 131–137. https://doi.org/10.26642/ema-2026-1(115)-131-137 [in Ukrainian]
  12. International Integrated Reporting Council. (2021). International <IR> framework. Retrieved from: https://www.integratedreporting.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/InternationalIntegratedReportingFramework.pdf
  13. Zhuk, V. M., Kantsurov, O. O., & Melnyk, K. P. (2021). Conceptual foundations of audit support for sustainable development of rural areas. Kyiv: NSC “IAE”. [in Ukrainian]
  14. Shmyhel, O. Y. (2018). Environmental accounting as a tool for management of environmental activity of the enterprise. Innovative economy, 5-6, 117–125. Retrieved from: https://inneco.org/index.php/innecoen/article/view/376 [in Ukrainian]
  15. Global Reporting Initiative. GRI 300: Environmental Standards Series. Retrieved from: https://esgdocs.sustainability-report.kr/en/category/environmental-standards/
  16. European Union. (2022). Directive (EU) 2022/2464 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 December 2022 as regards corporate sustainability reporting (CSRD). Retrieved from: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32022L2464
  17. Global Reporting Initiative. GRI 400: Social Standards Series. Retrieved from: https://www.globalreporting.org/standards/standards-development/gri-400-social-topics/
  18. International Organization for Standardization. (2010). ISO 26000:2010 Guidance on social responsibility. Retrieved from: https://www.iso.org/iso-26000-social-responsibility.html
  19. Social Accountability International. SA8000 Standard. Retrieved from: https://sa-intl.org/programs/sa8000/
  20. Pushkar, M. S., & Chumachenko, M. H. (2011). Ideal accounting system: Concept, architecture, information. Ternopil: Kart-blansh. [in Ukrainian]