e-ISSN 2518-1181
DOI 10.33146/2518-1181
Online Media ID R40-06293
← Back Published: 30.12.2025

Rural Banks (BPR/BPRS) in Indonesia: Regulation, Strategy, and the Wet-Market Segment

Authors

Doni Maradona Institute of Technology and Business Ahmad Dahlan, Jakarta, Indonesia ORCID 0009-0009-7194-8396

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33146/2518-1181-2025-4(110)-64-79

Abstract

Rural Banks (BPR/BPRS) play a critical role in expanding financial inclusion and supporting micro, small, and medium enterprises across Indonesia. Despite their strategic importance, the sector faces substantial structural challenges, including tightening regulatory requirements, uneven digital transformation, increasing credit risk, and persistent weaknesses in governance and operational capacity. These conditions necessitate a comprehensive assessment of the institutional dynamics, regulatory landscape, and strategic readiness of BPR/BPRS in navigating the rapidly changing financial ecosystem. This study aims to analyse: (1) the evolution of regulatory and institutional pressures shaping BPR/BPRS operations; (2) the current conditions of governance, digital capabilities, and risk structures; and (3) the strategic transformation required to strengthen institutional resilience and competitiveness. The study employs a qualitative descriptive approach, utilising documentary analysis of secondary data, including regulatory documents, industry publications, national banking statistics, and international comparative studies. Data were analysed using thematic content analysis, institutional analysis, and comparative strategic analysis. The findings reveal that BPR/BPRS are subject to increasing regulatory pressure, particularly related to capital adequacy, risk management, governance, and reporting integrity. Digitalisation is progressing but remains uneven, constrained by human resource limitations, technological readiness, and misalignment between digital initiatives and business strategy. Prudential indicators highlight vulnerabilities in credit risk and operational efficiency, while the wet-market segment offers growth potential that requires disciplined risk control. The study concludes that BPR/BPRS transformation requires: aligning business strategies with regulatory expectations, strengthening governance and human capital, accelerating capability-based digitalisation, and enhancing proactive risk management. Policy recommendations emphasise developing a realistic digital roadmap, promoting institutional consolidation, and reinforcing risk-based supervision to ensure long-term sector sustainability.

Keywords

rural banks, wet-market, microfinance, digitalization, pricing, prudential benchmarks, risk management, integrity, Indonesia
References
  1. Amanda, C. (2023). Rural banking spatial competition and stability. Economic Analysis and Policy, 78, 492–504. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.2023.03.021
  2. BI. (2024). Quick Response Code Indonesian Standard (QRIS). Jakarta: Bank Indonesia. Retrieved from: https://www.bi.go.id/id/fungsi-utama/sistem-pembayaran/ritel/kanal-layanan/qris/default.aspx
  3. FSA Indonesia. (2023). Salinan Surat Edaran Otoritas Jasa Keuangan Republik Indonesia Nomor 24/SEOJK.03/2023 tentang Penilaian Tingkat Maturitas Digital Bank Umum. Jakarta: Otoritas Jasa Keuangan. Retrieved from: https://www.ojk.go.id/id/regulasi/Documents/Pages/Penilaian-Tingkat-Maturitas-Digital-Bank-Umum/SEOJK%2024-SEOJK.03-2023.%20Penilaian%20Tingkat%20Maturitas%20Digital%20Bank%20Umum.pdf
  4. FSA Indonesia. (2024). Roadmap for the Development and Strengthening of the BPR and BPRS Industry (RP2B) 2024-2027. Jakarta: Otoritas Jasa Keuangan. Retrieved from: https://ojk.go.id/id/berita-dan-kegiatan/info-terkini/Documents/Pages/Roadmap-Pengembangan-dan-Penguatan-Industri-BPR-dan-BPRS-RP2B-2024---2027/Roadmap%20Pengembangan%20dan%20Penguatan%20Industri%20BPR%20dan%20BPRS%20RP2B%202024-2027.pdf
  5. IDIC. (2024). Pengumuman Nomor: Peng-2/DSPS/2024 tentang Penetapan Tingkat Bunga Penjamin untuk Simpanan di Bank Perekonomian Rakyat. Jakarta: Lembaga Penjamin Simpanan. Retrieved from: https://lps.go.id/peng-2-dsps-2024-tentang-penetapan-tingkat-bunga-penjaminan-untuk-simpanan-di-bpr/
  6. Ledgerwood, J., Earne, J., & Nelson, C. (2013). The New Microfinance Handbook: A Financial Market System Perspective. Washington DC, US: International Bank for Reconstruction and Development. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-0-8213-8927-0
  7. Oktavia, Siregar, S. V., Wardhani, R., & Rahayu, N. (2017). The Role of Tax environment on the relationship between tax avoidance and earnings quality: Evidence from ASEAN Country. International Journal of Economic Research, 14(10), 333–348.
  8. Puspitasari, D., Chin, J., & Dasman, S. (2025). Determinants and Prediction Model for Rural Bank Sustainability in Indonesia Post-COVID-19. Sustainability, 17(16), 7207. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17167207
  9. PWC. (2023). Indonesian Pocket Tax Book 2023. Jakarta: PT PricewaterhouseCoopers Indonesia Advisory. Retrieved from: https://www.pwc.com/id/en/pocket-tax-book/english/pocket-tax-book-2023.pdf
  10. Salas, M., Lamothe, P., Delgado, E., Fernández-Miguélez, A. L., & Valcarce, L. (2024). Determinants of Nonperforming Loans: A Global Data Analysis. Computational Economics, 64, 2695–2716. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10614-023-10543-8
  11. Wasiaturrahma, Sukmana, R., Ajija, S. R., Umi Salama, S. C., & Hudaifah, A. (2020). Financial performance of rural banks in Indonesia: a two-stage DEA approach. Heliyon, 6(7), e04390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04390