e-ISSN 2518-1181
DOI 10.33146/2518-1181
Online Media ID R40-06293
← Back Published: 30.12.2025

Participatory Budgeting as a Factor in Increasing Trust in Government and the Efficiency of Local Finances

Authors

Tetyana Vitovshchyk Academy of Recreational Technologies and Law, Lutsk, Ukraine ORCID 0009-0003-3825-7151
Svitlana Korzyk Academy of Recreational Technologies and Law, Lutsk, Ukraine ORCID 0009-0001-2845-8959

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33146/2518-1181-2025-4(110)-26-33

Abstract

Participatory budgeting is an effective tool for developing democracy, promoting transparency in public finance management, and enhancing accountability of government to citizens. Therefore, its implementation in Ukraine corresponds to modern trends in decentralisation of power and democratisation of society. The article aims to substantiate the implementation of successful foreign experience in participatory budgeting into Ukrainian practice as a tool for enhancing the efficiency of local finances in the context of decentralisation. The methodological basis of the study is a complex of systemic, analytical and empirical approaches that provide a comprehensive survey of participatory budgeting as a socio-economic and managerial phenomenon. The systemic approach in this study is fundamental, as the authors consider participatory budgeting a complex system that encompasses economic, social, legal, and managerial elements interconnected. The study’s results show that modern models of participatory budgeting combine multilevelness, digitalisation and institutional stability. At the same time, the differences between them are due to the political system of the state, the level of development of local self-government, the degree of digitalisation, the behavioural characteristics of citizens, and the volume of financial resources. In Ukraine, the practice of participatory budgeting is at the stage of experimental implementation, and therefore, it requires adapting foreign models. An analysis of the experience of Latin American countries, the European Union and North America allowed us to identify the main areas of implementation of practical approaches in national practice. They include the institutionalisation of participatory budgeting, digitalisation, ensuring electronic participation in management, involving citizens in decision-making, compliance with budgetary fairness and funding priorities, performance assessment and monitoring, and utilisation of international cooperation and funding opportunities. Measures such as developing a legislative framework, integrating electronic platforms, introducing citizen training, and systematic monitoring of results can significantly enhance the efficiency of local finances and foster a culture of democratic governance.

Keywords

public participation, decentralisation, foreign experience, institutionalisation, participatory budgeting, public finances, digitalisation
References
  1. Aziz, H., & Shah, N. (2021). Participatory budgeting: Models and approaches. In: Pathways between Social Science and Computational Social Science. Cham: Springer, pp. 215–236. Retrieved from: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2003.00606.pdf
  2. Cabannes, Y. (2004). Participatory Budgeting: Conceptual Framework and Analysis of Its Contribution to Urban Governance and the Millennium Development Goals. UN-Habitat. Retrieved from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/32893676_Participatory_Budgeting_Conceptual_Framework_and_Analysis_of_its_Contribution_to_Urban_Governance_and_the_Millenium_Development_Goals
  3. Johnson, C., Carlson, H. J., & Reynolds, S. (2023). Testing the participation hypothesis: Evidence from participatory budgeting. Political Behavior, 45(1), 3–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-021-09679-w
  4. Faliszewski, P., Flis, J., Peters, D., Pierczyński, G., Skowron, P., Stolicki, D., ... & Talmon, N. (2023). Participatory budgeting: Data, tools, and analysis. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.11035. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2305.11035
  5. Goldfrank, B. (2011). Lessons from Latin America’s Experience with Participatory Budgeting. Latin American Politics and Society, 53(3), 91–126. Retrieved from: https://shu.elsevierpure.com/en/publications/lessons-from-latin-americas-experience-with-participatory-budgeti/
  6. OECD. (2020). Innovative Citizen Participation and New Democratic Institutions: Catching the Deliberative Wave. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/339306da-en
  7. Participatory Budgeting World Atlas 2019. (2019). Cascais: Oficina. Retrieved from: https://www.cascais.pt/atlas2019
  8. Kotanidis, S., & Recchia, C. (2024). Participatory budgeting: A pathway to inclusive and transparent governance. European Parliamentary Research Service. Retrieved from: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/BRIE/2024/762412/EPRS_BRI(2024)762412_EN.pdf
  9. Shah, A. (ed.). (2007). Participatory Budgeting. Washington, D.C.: The World Bank.
  10. Sintomer, Y., Herzberg, C., & Röcke, A. (2008). Participatory Budgeting in Europe: Potentials and Challenges. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 32(1), 164–178. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2427.2008.00777.x
  11. Wampler, B. (2007). A Guide to Participatory Budgeting. In: Empowered Participation: Reinventing Urban Democracy. Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 47–78. Retrieved from: https://internationalbudget.org/wp-content/uploads/A-Guide-to-Participatory-Budgeting.pdf
  12. World Bank. (2019). Participatory Budgeting: Enhancing Citizen Engagement for Inclusive Governance. Washington, D.C.
  13. Karpinskyi, B. A. (2020). The Behavioral Finance as an Efficient Basis for Reflecting the Rationality and Irrationality of Financial Decisions in the System of the State-Creative Patriotism of the Nation. Business Inform, 6, 282–290. https://doi.org/10.32983/2222-4459-2020-6-282-290 [in Ukrainian]
  14. European Charter of Local Self-Government, Strasbourg, October 15, 1985. Official translation. Retrieved from: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/994_036#Text [in Ukrainian]
  15. Solodukhin, S. V., & Shaytanova, Ye. S. (2017). Modern approaches to the analysis of the influence of behavioral factors in the management of economic objects. Scientific Bulletin of Uzhhorod National University. Series: International Economic Relations and World Economy, 15(2), 129–132. Retrieved from: http://www.visnyk-econom.uzhnu.uz.ua/archive/15_2_2017ua/30.pdf [in Ukrainian]
  16. Recommendation Rec(2001)19 of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe “On citizens’ participation in local public life.” Adopted by the Committee of Ministers at the 776th meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies on 6.12.2001. Retrieved from: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/994_739#Text [in Ukrainian]