e-ISSN 2518-1181
DOI 10.33146/2518-1181
Online Media ID R40-06293
← Back Published: 30.03.2025

The New Partnership for Africa's Development: Differential Effect on the Development of Sub-Saharan Africa

Authors

Collins Ngwakwe University of Limpopo, Polokwane, South Africa ORCID 0000-0002-6954-8897
Dadson Awunyo-Vitor College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana ORCID 0000-0002-5669-3761

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33146/2307-9878-2025-1(107)-152-159

Abstract

African leaders have undertaken several initiatives to put the African continent back on the path of sustainable development. Among these initiatives, the New Partnership for Africa's Development (NEPAD) was established as a catalyst for alleviating the challenges of African development. This paper aims to evaluate the differential effect of NEPAD on the four objectives of NEPAD to establish if NEPAD has had significant differential effects within the years of NEPAD compared to the years before NEPAD. This will help to understand the priorities of NEPAD policy better. The paper relies on and expands existing research on NEPAD and African development. The research applies a mix of review and quantitative approaches. Proxy data on four of NEPAD's target variables of development were collected from the World Bank Economic Indicators. The data were analyzed using the paired sample t-test for means at an alpha level 0.05. The results of the study show mixed effects of NEPAD. On the one hand, two variables, namely GDP and women in tertiary education in sub-Saharan Africa over some twenty-one years of NEPAD, significantly surpasses the GDP and women in tertiary education in sub-Saharan Africa for twenty-one years before the inception of NEPAD at a p-value of less than 0.0001. On the other hand, another variable, namely merchandising export to higher-income countries from sub-Saharan Africa during the years of NEPAD, is significantly lower than merchandising export before the inception of NEPAD at a p-value of less than 0.0001. In addition, CO2 emissions are found to be significantly lower in the years before the inception of NEPAD than during the period of NEPAD at a p-value of less than 0.0001. These results provide insight for improved public administration policies to bolster merchandising exports. Therefore, this paper is an academic case study on sub-Saharan Africa's economic growth that offers a new agenda for future researchers.

Keywords

NEPAD, women empowerment, poverty reduction, merchandise export, African development, sustainable development
References
  1. ADB (African Development Bank). (2024). Africa dominates list of the world's 20 fastest-growing economies in 2024 – African Development Bank says in macroeconomic report. Retrieved from https://tinyurl.com/2s3jc3mn
  2. Alumona, N. O., & Alumona, C. M. (2024). Afro-centric Ethics of Development in a Global Capitalist Order. NIU Journal of Humanities, 9(1), 85-92. https://doi.org/10.58709/niujhu.v9i1.1829
  3. AUDA. (2022) History of NEPAD. Retrieved from https://www.nepad.org/who-we-are/history
  4. Benedek, D. E., Crivelli, S. G. & Muthoora, P. (2013). Foreign Aid and Revenue: Still a Crowding-out Effect? Public Finance Analysis, 70(1), 67-96.
  5. Brautigam, D. A., & Knack, S. (2004). Foreign Aid, Institutions, and Governance in Sub-Saharan Africa. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 52(2), 255–285.
  6. Bullen, S (2011). NEPAD and African Development Policy. E-International Relations. Retrieved from https://www.e-ir.info/pdf/15464
  7. Carter, P. (2013). Does foreign aid discourage taxation?. Mimeo: Department of Economics, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.
  8. Economic Commission for Africa. (2012). Report on United Nations system-wide support to the African Union and its NEPAD programme. E/ECA/COE/31/14. Addis Ababa, Retrieved from https://tinyurl.com/skw8am2y
  9. Gottschalk, K., & Schmidt, S. (2004). The African Union and the New Partnership for Africa's Development: Strong institutions for weak states. Internationale Politik und Gesellschaft, 4(2004), 138-158. Retrieved from https://scispace.com/pdf/the-african-union-and-the-new-partnership-for-africa-s-47078emm5e.pdf
  10. Hope, K. R. (2002). From Crisis to Renewal: Towards a Successful Implementation of the New Partnership for Africa's Development. African Affairs, 101(2002), 387-402.
  11. Lockwood, J. M. (2006). Recent Developments, Florida State University Journal of Transnational Law & Policy, 15(2). Retrieved from https://ir.law.fsu.edu/jtlp/vol15/iss2/6
  12. Mbeki, T. (2001). Millennium Africa Renaissance Program – Implementation Issues Briefing at the World Economic Forum Meeting. Retrieved from http://www.nepad.com
  13. Melber, H. (2002). The New Partnership for Africa's Development: Old Wine in New Bottles? Norwegian Institute of International Affairs: Forum for Development Studies, 29(1), 186-211.
  14. Mkandawire, T. (2001). Thinking about developmental states in Africa. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 25, 289-313.
  15. Moss, T., Pettersson, G. & van de Walle, N. (2008). An Aid-institutions paradox? A Review Essay on Aid Dependency and State Building in Sub-Saharan Africa. In (W. Easterly, ed.) Reinventing Foreign Aid. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
  16. Moyo, D. (2009). Why Foreign Aid Is Hurting Africa. The Wall Street Journal, 11 March. Retrieved from https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB123758895999200083
  17. NEPAD. (2001). New Partnership for Africa's Development policy framework, created in Abuja, Nigeria. Retrieved from http://www.nepad.org/system/files/framework_0.pdf
  18. NEPAD. (2023). Origin of NEPAD. Retrieved from https://www.nepadaprmkenya.go.ke/origins-of-nepad/
  19. Olukoshi, A. (2002). Governing the African Political Space for Sustainable Development: a reflection on NEPAD. Paper prepared for the African Forum for Envisioning Africa. Nairobi, Kenya 26- 29 April 2002.
  20. Osamwonyi, I., & Osaseri, G. (2020). A Causality Study of Stock Market Development and Economic Growth in Nigeria and Brics. Acta Universitatis Danubius. Administratio, 12(1), 7–23.
  21. Sachs, J. D., McArthur, J. W, Schmidt-Traub J., Kruk, M., Bahadur, C., Michael Faye M, & McCord G. (2004). Ending Africa's poverty trap. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1, 117-240. Retrieved from https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2004/01/2004a_bpea_sachs.pdf
  22. STATS SA (Statistics South Africa). (2024). Marginalised Communities in SA Achieve New Heights in Education. Retrieved from https://www.statssa.gov.za/?p=17134
  23. UN (Department of Economic and Social Affair). (2023). New Partnership for Africa's Development NEPAD. Retrieved from https://tinyurl.com/3dtv4zxv
  24. UNCTAD. (2012). The New Partnership for Africa's Development: Performance, challenges, and the role of UNCTAD. Retrieved from https://unctad.org/system/files/official-document/tdbex55d3_en.pdf
  25. University of Minessota. (2001). New Partnership for Africa's Development. http://hrlibrary.umn.edu/instree/nepad.html
  26. Unya, I. U., & Okorie, M. (2024). The New Partnership for Africa's Development and Regional Integration in Africa: Challenges and Prospects. Kashere Journal of Politics and International Relations, 2(1), 90-100. Retrieved from https://journals.fukashere.edu.ng/index.php/kjpir/article/view/191
  27. World Bank. (2024). World Development Indicators. Retrieved from http://wdi.worldbank.org/tables